PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LQD vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

LQD vs. DBO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LQD (iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - LQD is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LQD returned 2.52%/yr vs 11.37%/yr for DBO. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. LQD charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.

Performance

LQD vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQD achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return. Over the past 10 years, LQD has underperformed DBO with an annualized return of 2.52%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.37% annualized return.

LQD

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.72%
YTD
0.46%
6M
-0.03%
1Y
6.08%
3Y*
4.95%
5Y*
-0.04%
10Y*
2.52%

DBO

1D
2.27%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
84.75%
6M
81.10%
1Y
80.26%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LQD vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF		0.46%7.90%0.86%9.40%-17.92%-1.84%10.97%17.37%-3.79%7.06%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund		84.75%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-15.22%4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between LQD and DBO is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2007

-0.07

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between LQD and DBO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.07 to -0.40, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF

Invesco DB Oil Fund

Often compared with LQD:
LQD vs. HYGLQD vs. VCITLQD vs. IEFLQD vs. TLTLQD vs. LQDWLQD vs. VCLTLQD vs. LQDH
Often compared with DBO:
DBO vs. USODBO vs. USLDBO vs. OILKDBO vs. OIHDBO vs. xleDBO vs. TPLDBO vs. KSA

Return for Risk

LQD vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LQD
LQD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
LQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQD Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
LQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQD Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQD vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

LQDDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.14
2.34

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.67
2.94

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.38

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

4.44

-2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.23

9.02

-3.80

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LQD vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQD Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQD and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

LQDDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

2.34

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.50

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.36

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.02

+0.52

Drawdowns

LQD vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQD drawdown since its inception was -24.95%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQD and DBO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

LQDDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.95%

-90.18%

+65.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.34%

-18.19%

+14.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.43%

-28.20%

+19.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.95%

-37.68%

+12.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.95%

-61.69%

+36.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.72%

-51.38%

+47.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-62.25%

+58.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

8.92%

-7.75%

Volatility

LQD vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) is 1.65%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that LQD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

LQDDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.65%

12.61%

-10.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.90%

28.20%

-24.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.36%

34.46%

-29.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.65%

32.29%

-23.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.68%

31.78%

-23.10%

LQD vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

LQD vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

LQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than DBO's 1.90% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund		1.90%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF		4.57%4.48%4.45%3.99%3.30%2.30%2.66%3.29%3.67%3.10%3.34%3.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

LQD and DBO have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to LQD (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQD dropped -24.95% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 10-year performance, DBO leads with 11.37% vs 2.52% for LQD. On fees, LQD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, LQD has been the lower-risk option at 1.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBO has performed better with a 11.37% return vs 2.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LQD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

LQD has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 1.90% for DBO.

LQD is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while DBO is Oil & Gas. LQD tracks iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for LQD and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LQD and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer