LQAI vs. PSCX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

LQAI (LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF) and PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LQAI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while PSCX is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LQAI returned 22.80% vs 13.16% for PSCX. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

LQAI vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQAI achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's 5.97% return.

LQAI

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -3.16%
• 6M: 11.94%
• YTD: 14.28%
• 1Y: 22.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 24.41%

PSCX

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 0.79%
• 6M: 5.38%
• YTD: 5.97%
• 1Y: 13.16%
• 3Y*: 11.95%
• 5Y*: 8.41%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LQAI LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF	$9.07K	$10.19K	$17.32K
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	$30.18K	$20.77K	$40.17K

LQAI vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LQAI LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF	14.28%	13.70%	27.82%	9.29%
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	5.97%	12.08%	13.27%	4.11%

Correlation

The correlation between LQAI and PSCX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023	0.82

The correlation between LQAI and PSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

LQAI vs. PSCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LQAI	PSCX
Technology	43.2%	38.5%
Financial Services	11.7%	11.6%
Communication Services	10.9%	9.9%
Utilities	8.2%	2.2%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	4.5%
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	9.5%
Industrials	3.9%	8.4%
Healthcare	2.8%	8.9%
Energy	2.2%	3.0%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.8%
Basic Materials	0.1%	1.7%

Return for Risk

LQAI vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LQAI

LQAI Risk / Return Rank: 47
LQAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
LQAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
LQAI Omega Ratio Rank: 45
LQAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
LQAI Martin Ratio Rank: 46

PSCX

PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 88
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LQAI vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LQAI	PSCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	2.14	-0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	3.15	-1.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.42	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.98	2.92	-0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.30	14.53	-9.23

LQAI vs. PSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the PSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQAI and PSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LQAI vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQAI drawdown since its inception was -21.24%, which is greater than PSCX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQAI and PSCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LQAI	PSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.24%	-10.20%	-11.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.75%	-4.20%	-6.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.61%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-10.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.64%	0.00%	-7.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.13%	-1.82%	-1.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.01%	0.85%	+3.16%

Volatility

LQAI vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison

LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) at 1.55%. This indicates that LQAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LQAI	PSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.78%	1.55%	+5.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.24%	4.63%	+10.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.60%	5.75%	+12.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.81%	7.14%	+10.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.81%	6.94%	+10.87%

LQAI vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LQAI and PSCX have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

LQAI vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison

LQAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LQAI LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF	0.95%	1.14%	0.69%	0.16%
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LQAI and PSCX in my portfolio?

LQAI and PSCX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LQAI or PSCX?

LQAI has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to PSCX (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQAI dropped -21.24% vs PSCX's -10.20%.

Which ETF is better, LQAI or PSCX?

On 1-year performance, LQAI leads with 22.80% vs 13.16% for PSCX. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 1.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LQAI or PSCX?

Over the 1-year period, LQAI has performed better with a 22.80% return vs 13.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LQAI or PSCX?

LQAI and PSCX have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LQAI or PSCX?

LQAI has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.

What is the main difference between LQAI and PSCX?

LQAI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PSCX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Pacer.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.