LQAI vs. HTEC
LQAI (LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF) and HTEC (ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LQAI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while HTEC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index. LQAI is actively managed, while HTEC is passively managed. Over the past year, LQAI returned 22.80% vs 38.75% for HTEC. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LQAI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for HTEC.
Performance
LQAI vs. HTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQAI achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly higher than HTEC's 8.91% return.
LQAI
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -3.16%
- 6M
- 11.94%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 1Y
- 22.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 24.41%
HTEC
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- 6M
- 5.34%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 1Y
- 38.75%
- 3Y*
- 8.78%
- 5Y*
- -3.93%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $648.14K | $1.29M | $661.96K | |
| $9.07K | $10.19K | $17.32K |
LQAI vs. HTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LQAI LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF | 14.28% | 13.70% | 27.82% | 9.29% |
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | 8.91% | 23.91% | 2.68% | 19.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQAI and HTEC is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023 | 0.53 |
The correlation between LQAI and HTEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LQAI vs. HTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LQAI
HTEC
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
LQAI
HTEC
Financial Services
LQAI
HTEC
Communication Services
LQAI
HTEC
-
Utilities
LQAI
HTEC
-
Consumer Defensive
LQAI
HTEC
-
Consumer Cyclical
LQAI
HTEC
-
Industrials
LQAI
HTEC
Healthcare
LQAI
HTEC
Energy
LQAI
HTEC
Real Estate
LQAI
HTEC
-
Basic Materials
LQAI
HTEC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQAI vs. HTEC — Risk / Return Rank
LQAI
HTEC
LQAI vs. HTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) and ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LQAI | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.31 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 2.40 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | 5.75 | -0.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LQAI vs. HTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQAI drawdown since its inception was -21.24%, smaller than the maximum HTEC drawdown of -57.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQAI and HTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQAI | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.24% | -57.53% | +36.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.75% | -16.31% | +5.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.64% | -25.08% | +17.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -28.95% | +25.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 6.80% | -2.79% |
Volatility
LQAI vs. HTEC - Volatility Comparison
LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) at 5.00%. This indicates that LQAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQAI | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 5.00% | +1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.24% | 16.46% | -1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.60% | 21.21% | -2.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 24.64% | -6.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 25.43% | -7.62% |
LQAI vs. HTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQAI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HTEC's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
LQAI vs. HTEC - Dividend Comparison
LQAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than HTEC's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | 0.90% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
LQAI LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF | 0.95% | 1.14% | 0.69% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LQAI and HTEC have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LQAI has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to HTEC (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQAI dropped -21.24% vs HTEC's -57.53%.
On 1-year performance, HTEC leads with 38.75% vs 22.80% for LQAI. On fees, HTEC is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, HTEC has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HTEC has performed better with a 38.75% return vs 22.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HTEC is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LQAI.
LQAI has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.90% for HTEC.
LQAI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while HTEC is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for LQAI and 0.68% for HTEC.
HTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LQAI and HTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer