LQAI vs. EMQQ
LQAI (LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF) and EMQQ (EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LQAI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while EMQQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index. LQAI is actively managed, while EMQQ is passively managed. Over the past year, LQAI returned 22.80% vs -12.02% for EMQQ. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LQAI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for EMQQ.
Performance
LQAI vs. EMQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQAI achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly higher than EMQQ's -14.82% return.
LQAI
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -3.16%
- 6M
- 11.94%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 1Y
- 22.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 24.41%
EMQQ
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 7.64%
- 6M
- -13.01%
- YTD
- -14.82%
- 1Y
- -12.02%
- 3Y*
- 3.09%
- 5Y*
- -7.26%
- 10Y*
- 4.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.08M | $1.15M | $1.71M | |
| $9.07K | $10.19K | $17.32K |
LQAI vs. EMQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LQAI LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF | 14.28% | 13.70% | 27.82% | 9.29% |
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | -14.82% | 20.66% | 13.79% | 3.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQAI and EMQQ is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023 | 0.50 |
The correlation between LQAI and EMQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
LQAI vs. EMQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LQAI
EMQQ
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
LQAI
EMQQ
Financial Services
LQAI
EMQQ
Communication Services
LQAI
EMQQ
Utilities
LQAI
EMQQ
Consumer Defensive
LQAI
EMQQ
Consumer Cyclical
LQAI
EMQQ
Industrials
LQAI
EMQQ
Healthcare
LQAI
EMQQ
Energy
LQAI
EMQQ
-
Real Estate
LQAI
EMQQ
Basic Materials
LQAI
EMQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQAI vs. EMQQ — Risk / Return Rank
LQAI
EMQQ
LQAI vs. EMQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) and EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LQAI | EMQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.91 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | -0.39 | +2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | -0.70 | +6.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LQAI vs. EMQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQAI drawdown since its inception was -21.24%, smaller than the maximum EMQQ drawdown of -73.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQAI and EMQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQAI | EMQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.24% | -73.24% | +52.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.75% | -33.70% | +22.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -33.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.64% | -55.12% | +47.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -31.71% | +28.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 18.96% | -14.95% |
Volatility
LQAI vs. EMQQ - Volatility Comparison
LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) at 5.14%. This indicates that LQAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQAI | EMQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 5.14% | +1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.24% | 17.04% | -1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.60% | 21.16% | -2.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 32.74% | -14.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 30.58% | -12.77% |
LQAI vs. EMQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQAI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EMQQ's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
LQAI vs. EMQQ - Dividend Comparison
LQAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than EMQQ's 3.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | 3.63% | 3.09% | 1.70% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.08% |
LQAI LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF | 0.95% | 1.14% | 0.69% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LQAI and EMQQ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LQAI has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to EMQQ (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQAI dropped -21.24% vs EMQQ's -73.24%.
On 1-year performance, LQAI leads with 22.80% vs -12.02% for EMQQ. On fees, LQAI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, EMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LQAI has performed better with a 22.80% return vs -12.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LQAI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.
EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 0.95% for LQAI.
LQAI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EMQQ is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for LQAI and 0.86% for EMQQ.
LQAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LQAI and EMQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer