PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LPJIX vs. FFANX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LPJIX vs. FFANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2035 Fund (LPJIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LPJIX achieves a 8.29% return, which is significantly higher than FFANX's 7.45% return. Over the past 10 years, LPJIX has outperformed FFANX with an annualized return of 9.24%, while FFANX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.99% annualized return.


LPJIX

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.92%
YTD
8.29%
6M
7.76%
1Y
18.58%
3Y*
12.09%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
9.24%

FFANX

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.41%
YTD
7.45%
6M
7.31%
1Y
16.42%
3Y*
11.28%
5Y*
5.36%
10Y*
6.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LPJIX vs. FFANX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LPJIX
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2035 Fund
8.29%15.27%4.57%17.50%-16.57%12.73%13.52%23.67%-6.36%18.98%
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
7.45%13.16%7.40%11.52%-13.62%8.03%13.10%15.81%-4.06%11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between LPJIX and FFANX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2010

0.93

The correlation between LPJIX and FFANX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LPJIX vs. FFANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LPJIX
LPJIX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
LPJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LPJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
LPJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
LPJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
LPJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FFANX
FFANX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FFANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFANX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FFANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFANX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LPJIX vs. FFANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2035 Fund (LPJIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LPJIXFFANXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.47

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

3.27

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.48

13.95

-1.47

LPJIX vs. FFANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LPJIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the FFANX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LPJIX and FFANX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LPJIX vs. FFANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LPJIX drawdown since its inception was -29.86%, smaller than the maximum FFANX drawdown of -31.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPJIX and FFANX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LPJIXFFANXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.86%

-31.69%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.64%

-5.20%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.69%

-7.55%

-9.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.71%

-18.52%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.86%

-18.52%

-11.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-0.13%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.92%

-3.79%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

1.22%

+0.34%

Volatility

LPJIX vs. FFANX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2035 Fund (LPJIX) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) at 2.94%. This indicates that LPJIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LPJIXFFANXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

2.94%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.24%

6.01%

+2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.01%

7.09%

+2.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.83%

7.94%

+4.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.97%

7.74%

+5.23%

LPJIX vs. FFANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LPJIX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than FFANX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

LPJIX vs. FFANX - Dividend Comparison

LPJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, which matches FFANX's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
3.65%3.97%2.81%2.49%5.75%2.35%2.36%3.67%4.56%2.56%1.43%3.18%
LPJIX
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2035 Fund
3.67%3.98%0.77%3.17%2.12%11.29%1.89%5.20%11.21%8.99%1.89%4.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, LPJIX and FFANX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LPJIX has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to FFANX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPJIX dropped -29.86% vs FFANX's -31.69%.

FFANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LPJIX and FFANX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer