PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LPJIX vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LPJIX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2035 Fund (LPJIX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LPJIX vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LPJIX
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2035 Fund
-2.32%15.27%4.57%17.50%-16.57%12.73%13.52%23.67%-6.36%18.98%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-4.63%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LPJIX achieves a -2.32% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -4.63% return. Over the past 10 years, LPJIX has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 8.05%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.16% annualized return.


LPJIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-6.39%
YTD
-2.32%
6M
-0.58%
1Y
12.67%
3Y*
9.15%
5Y*
4.67%
10Y*
8.05%

^GSPC

1D
2.91%
1M
-5.09%
YTD
-4.63%
6M
-2.39%
1Y
16.33%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
10.18%
10Y*
12.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LPJIX vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LPJIX
LPJIX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
LPJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LPJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
LPJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
LPJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
LPJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LPJIX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2035 Fund (LPJIX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LPJIX^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

0.90

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.54

1.39

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.21

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

1.40

-0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.49

6.61

-0.12

LPJIX vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LPJIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LPJIX and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LPJIX^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

0.90

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.61

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.68

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.46

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between LPJIX and ^GSPC is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

LPJIX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LPJIX drawdown since its inception was -29.86%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPJIX and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LPJIX^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.86%

-56.78%

+26.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.49%

-12.14%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.71%

-25.43%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.86%

-33.92%

+4.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.64%

-6.45%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-10.75%

+6.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

2.57%

-0.78%

Volatility

LPJIX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2035 Fund (LPJIX) is 4.14%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that LPJIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LPJIX^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

5.34%

-1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.04%

9.54%

-2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.22%

18.33%

-6.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.69%

16.91%

-4.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.89%

18.05%

-5.16%