LPJIX vs. PDGZX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LPJIX (BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2035 Fund) and PDGZX (PIMCO RealPath Blend 2035 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, LPJIX returned 9.24%/yr vs 9.86%/yr for PDGZX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LPJIX charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PDGZX.

Performance

LPJIX vs. PDGZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2035 Fund (LPJIX) and PIMCO RealPath Blend 2035 Fund (PDGZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LPJIX having a 8.29% return and PDGZX slightly higher at 8.55%. Over the past 10 years, LPJIX has underperformed PDGZX with an annualized return of 9.24%, while PDGZX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.86% annualized return.

LPJIX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 8.29%
• 6M: 7.76%
• 1Y: 18.58%
• 3Y*: 12.09%
• 5Y*: 5.75%
• 10Y*: 9.24%

PDGZX

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 1.19%
• YTD: 8.55%
• 6M: 8.14%
• 1Y: 20.04%
• 3Y*: 14.46%
• 5Y*: 7.36%
• 10Y*: 9.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LPJIX vs. PDGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LPJIX BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2035 Fund	8.29%	15.27%	4.57%	17.50%	-16.57%	12.73%	13.52%	23.67%	-6.36%	18.98%
PDGZX PIMCO RealPath Blend 2035 Fund	8.55%	16.92%	10.09%	16.52%	-17.06%	15.06%	13.72%	22.67%	-6.75%	18.13%

Correlation

The correlation between LPJIX and PDGZX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015	0.94

The correlation between LPJIX and PDGZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LPJIX vs. PDGZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LPJIX

LPJIX Risk / Return Rank: 57
LPJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
LPJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
LPJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
LPJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
LPJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

PDGZX

PDGZX Risk / Return Rank: 72
PDGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
PDGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
PDGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
PDGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
PDGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LPJIX vs. PDGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2035 Fund (LPJIX) and PIMCO RealPath Blend 2035 Fund (PDGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LPJIX	PDGZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	2.31	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	3.20	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.44	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.94	2.99	-0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.48	13.07	-0.59

LPJIX vs. PDGZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LPJIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the PDGZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LPJIX and PDGZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LPJIX vs. PDGZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LPJIX drawdown since its inception was -29.86%, which is greater than PDGZX's maximum drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPJIX and PDGZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LPJIX	PDGZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.86%	-27.25%	-2.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.64%	-7.00%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.69%	-10.65%	-6.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.71%	-24.26%	+0.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.86%	-27.25%	-2.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.64%	-0.57%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.92%	-4.38%	+0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.56%	1.60%	-0.04%

Volatility

LPJIX vs. PDGZX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2035 Fund (LPJIX) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to PIMCO RealPath Blend 2035 Fund (PDGZX) at 3.58%. This indicates that LPJIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LPJIX	PDGZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.97%	3.58%	+0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.24%	7.56%	+0.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.01%	9.10%	+0.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.83%	11.68%	+1.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.97%	12.22%	+0.75%

LPJIX vs. PDGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LPJIX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than PDGZX's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

LPJIX vs. PDGZX - Dividend Comparison

LPJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, less than PDGZX's 5.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LPJIX BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2035 Fund	3.67%	3.98%	0.77%	3.17%	2.12%	11.29%	1.89%	5.20%	11.21%	8.99%	1.89%	4.52%
PDGZX PIMCO RealPath Blend 2035 Fund	5.71%	5.09%	4.17%	2.73%	3.30%	4.92%	2.12%	3.71%	5.84%	2.17%	2.72%	2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LPJIX and PDGZX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, LPJIX and PDGZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LPJIX or PDGZX?

LPJIX has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to PDGZX (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPJIX dropped -29.86% vs PDGZX's -27.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PDGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.