LPE.PA vs. ^IXIC
LPE.PA (Laurent-Perrier S.A.) is a stock, while ^IXIC (NASDAQ Composite) is an index. Over the past 10 years, LPE.PA returned 3.67%/yr vs 18.11%/yr for ^IXIC. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LPE.PA vs. ^IXIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LPE.PA is traded in EUR, while ^IXIC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^IXIC values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LPE.PA achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly lower than ^IXIC's 16.76% return. Over the past 10 years, LPE.PA has underperformed ^IXIC with an annualized return of 3.67%, while ^IXIC has yielded a comparatively higher 18.11% annualized return.
LPE.PA
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 4.71%
- YTD
- -0.22%
- 6M
- -6.12%
- 1Y
- -4.20%
- 3Y*
- -10.09%
- 5Y*
- 1.48%
- 10Y*
- 3.67%
^IXIC
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 6.65%
- YTD
- 16.76%
- 6M
- 14.46%
- 1Y
- 35.56%
- 3Y*
- 23.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.26%
- 10Y*
- 18.11%
LPE.PA vs. ^IXIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPE.PA Laurent-Perrier S.A. | -0.22% | -11.44% | -13.37% | -8.25% | 31.06% | 39.34% | -12.94% | -6.82% | 15.20% | 17.31% |
^IXIC NASDAQ Composite | 16.77% | 6.07% | 37.13% | 39.12% | -28.95% | 30.47% | 31.80% | 38.28% | 0.63% | 12.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between LPE.PA and ^IXIC is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2007 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LPE.PA vs. ^IXIC — Risk / Return Rank
LPE.PA
^IXIC
LPE.PA vs. ^IXIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Laurent-Perrier S.A. (LPE.PA) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LPE.PA | ^IXIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.38 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 2.90 | -3.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.55 | 9.42 | -9.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LPE.PA | ^IXIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 | 2.17 | -2.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.70 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | 0.81 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.64 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
LPE.PA vs. ^IXIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LPE.PA drawdown since its inception was -71.77%, which is greater than ^IXIC's maximum drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPE.PA and ^IXIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LPE.PA | ^IXIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.77% | -49.37% | -22.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.92% | -12.32% | -3.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.03% | -28.54% | -5.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.20% | -32.41% | -5.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.20% | -32.41% | -5.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.25% | -0.83% | -32.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.13% | -8.78% | -19.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.36% | 3.78% | +4.58% |
Volatility
LPE.PA vs. ^IXIC - Volatility Comparison
Laurent-Perrier S.A. (LPE.PA) has a higher volatility of 6.88% compared to NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) at 3.52%. This indicates that LPE.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^IXIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LPE.PA | ^IXIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.88% | 3.52% | +3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.04% | 11.50% | +5.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.64% | 16.45% | +5.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.14% | 22.06% | +0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.71% | 22.31% | -0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LPE.PA and ^IXIC have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LPE.PA and ^IXIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer