LOUP vs. QFLR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LOUP (Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF) and QFLR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LOUP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index, while QFLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Innovator. LOUP is passively managed, while QFLR is actively managed. Over the past year, LOUP returned 75.49% vs 26.98% for QFLR. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LOUP charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for QFLR.

Performance

LOUP vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOUP achieves a 28.21% return, which is significantly higher than QFLR's 6.90% return.

LOUP

• 1D: -1.87%
• 1M: 18.57%
• YTD: 28.21%
• 6M: 26.83%
• 1Y: 75.49%
• 3Y*: 37.37%
• 5Y*: 12.98%
• 10Y*: —

QFLR

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 3.99%
• YTD: 6.90%
• 6M: 5.88%
• 1Y: 26.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOUP vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF	28.21%	43.24%	23.11%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	6.90%	17.27%	16.64%

Correlation

The correlation between LOUP and QFLR is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024	0.78

The correlation between LOUP and QFLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

LOUP vs. QFLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LOUP	QFLR
Technology	51.0%	50.8%
Industrials	20.0%	2.8%
Communication Services	10.6%	18.4%
Consumer Cyclical	5.5%	12.1%
Financial Services	4.5%	0.9%
Energy	2.9%	1.1%
Utilities	2.8%	1.5%
Healthcare	2.7%	3.2%
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	9.2%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

LOUP vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOUP

LOUP Risk / Return Rank: 71
LOUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
LOUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
LOUP Omega Ratio Rank: 67
LOUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
LOUP Martin Ratio Rank: 67

QFLR

QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 74
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 74
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOUP vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LOUP	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.66	2.41	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	3.26	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.44	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.61	3.56	+0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.23	15.19	-2.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LOUP vs. QFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOUP Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the QFLR Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOUP and QFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LOUP	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.66	2.41	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	1.40	-0.81

Drawdowns

LOUP vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOUP drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than QFLR's maximum drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOUP and QFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOUP	QFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.68%	-13.97%	-44.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.00%	-7.61%	-13.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.87%	-0.48%	-1.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.04%	-2.50%	-17.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.19%	1.78%	+4.41%

Volatility

LOUP vs. QFLR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a higher volatility of 8.23% compared to Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) at 2.53%. This indicates that LOUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LOUP	QFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.23%	2.53%	+5.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.94%	8.05%	+13.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.51%	11.28%	+17.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.38%	12.62%	+19.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.96%	12.62%	+19.34%

LOUP vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOUP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

LOUP vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison

Neither LOUP nor QFLR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	0.00%	0.02%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LOUP and QFLR in my portfolio?

LOUP and QFLR have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LOUP or QFLR?

LOUP has higher volatility (8.23%) compared to QFLR (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOUP dropped -58.68% vs QFLR's -13.97%.

Which ETF is better, LOUP or QFLR?

On 1-year performance, LOUP leads with 75.49% vs 26.98% for QFLR. On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, QFLR has been the lower-risk option at 2.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LOUP or QFLR?

Over the 1-year period, LOUP has performed better with a 75.49% return vs 26.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LOUP or QFLR?

LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for QFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LOUP or QFLR?

LOUP and QFLR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between LOUP and QFLR?

LOUP is categorized as Technology Equities, while QFLR is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LOUP and 0.89% for QFLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LOUP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.