PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOUP vs. GINN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LOUP vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOUP achieves a 30.66% return, which is significantly higher than GINN's 10.05% return.


LOUP

1D
0.51%
1M
20.92%
YTD
30.66%
6M
29.25%
1Y
81.09%
3Y*
38.24%
5Y*
13.62%
10Y*

GINN

1D
-0.35%
1M
6.63%
YTD
10.05%
6M
10.24%
1Y
28.46%
3Y*
20.47%
5Y*
7.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOUP vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LOUP
Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF
30.66%43.24%21.80%51.31%-46.00%7.54%20.27%
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
10.05%20.25%18.71%29.94%-32.40%10.39%9.84%

Correlation

The correlation between LOUP and GINN is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2020

0.89

The correlation between LOUP and GINN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

LOUP vs. GINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LOUP
GINN

Technology

51.0%
32.4%

Industrials

20.0%
6.1%

Communication Services

10.6%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
14.6%

Financial Services

4.5%
11.4%

Energy

2.9%
1.4%

Utilities

2.8%
1.9%

Healthcare

2.7%
18.6%

Basic Materials

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.0%

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Technology

LOUP
51.0%
GINN
32.4%

Industrials

LOUP
20.0%
GINN
6.1%

Communication Services

LOUP
10.6%
GINN
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

LOUP
5.5%
GINN
14.6%

Financial Services

LOUP
4.5%
GINN
11.4%

Energy

LOUP
2.9%
GINN
1.4%

Utilities

LOUP
2.8%
GINN
1.9%

Healthcare

LOUP
2.7%
GINN
18.6%

Basic Materials

LOUP

-

GINN
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

LOUP

-

GINN
2.0%

Real Estate

LOUP

-

GINN
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOUP vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOUP
LOUP Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
LOUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOUP Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
LOUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOUP Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

GINN
GINN Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOUP vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LOUPGINNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.87

1.79

+1.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.39

2.48

+0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.31

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.02

2.22

+1.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.63

8.02

+5.61

LOUP vs. GINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOUP Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is higher than the GINN Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOUP and GINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LOUPGINNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87

1.79

+1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.35

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.46

+0.14

Drawdowns

LOUP vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOUP drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than GINN's maximum drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOUP and GINN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOUPGINNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.68%

-41.25%

-17.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.00%

-13.18%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.23%

-22.25%

-12.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.63%

-41.25%

-14.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.35%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.05%

-13.37%

-6.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.19%

3.64%

+2.55%

Volatility

LOUP vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a higher volatility of 7.78% compared to Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) at 3.66%. This indicates that LOUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOUPGINNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.78%

3.66%

+4.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.85%

11.99%

+9.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.47%

16.01%

+12.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.38%

21.32%

+11.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.97%

21.05%

+10.92%

LOUP vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOUP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

LOUP vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

LOUP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
1.15%1.26%1.26%1.01%0.69%0.67%0.07%
LOUP
Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LOUP and GINN have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LOUP has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to GINN (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOUP dropped -58.68% vs GINN's -41.25%.

On 5-year performance, LOUP leads with 13.62% vs 7.37% for GINN. On fees, GINN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LOUP has performed better with a 13.62% return vs 7.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GINN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for LOUP.

GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.00% for LOUP.

LOUP tracks Deepwater Frontier Tech Index, while GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LOUP and 0.50% for GINN.

LOUP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOUP and GINN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer