LOPP vs. GOLS
LOPP (Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF) and GOLS (Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LOPP is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli, while GOLS is a Communications Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. Both are actively managed. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LOPP charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for GOLS.
Performance
LOPP vs. GOLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LOPP
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -3.85%
- 6M
- 5.86%
- YTD
- 13.15%
- 1Y
- 23.23%
- 3Y*
- 13.97%
- 5Y*
- 7.43%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.17%
GOLS
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- 6M
- 6.08%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $118.16K | $131.19K | $97.70K | |
| $4.28K | $5.15K | $15.80K |
LOPP vs. GOLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LOPP Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF | 13.15% |
GOLS Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF | 5.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOPP and GOLS is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOPP vs. GOLS — Risk / Return Rank
LOPP
GOLS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LOPP vs. GOLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) and Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF (GOLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LOPP | GOLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.11 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LOPP vs. GOLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOPP drawdown since its inception was -25.28%, which is greater than GOLS's maximum drawdown of -7.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOPP and GOLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOPP | GOLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.28% | -7.85% | -17.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.12% | -1.71% | -4.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.09% | -1.98% | -6.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | — | — |
Volatility
LOPP vs. GOLS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOPP | GOLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.40% | 13.82% | +3.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 13.82% | +4.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.72% | 13.82% | +3.90% |
LOPP vs. GOLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOPP has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than GOLS's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOPP vs. GOLS - Dividend Comparison
LOPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while GOLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOLS Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LOPP Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF | 0.73% | 0.83% | 1.88% | 2.23% | 2.01% | 1.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOPP and GOLS have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOPP is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOPP is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GOLS.
LOPP has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for GOLS.
LOPP is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while GOLS is Communications Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for LOPP and 0.90% for GOLS.
Find the right allocation for LOPP and GOLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer