LOPP vs. FFSM

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

LOPP (Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF) and FFSM (Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, LOPP returned 8.50%/yr vs 10.98%/yr for FFSM. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LOPP charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FFSM.

Performance

LOPP vs. FFSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) and Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOPP achieves a 17.85% return, which is significantly lower than FFSM's 22.47% return.

LOPP

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 5.26%
• YTD: 17.85%
• 6M: 16.06%
• 1Y: 33.45%
• 3Y*: 17.09%
• 5Y*: 8.50%
• 10Y*: —

FFSM

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 5.51%
• YTD: 22.47%
• 6M: 19.44%
• 1Y: 39.96%
• 3Y*: 22.39%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOPP vs. FFSM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LOPP Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF	17.85%	22.61%	9.89%	4.74%	-15.04%	17.04%
FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF	22.47%	14.89%	14.38%	17.30%	-16.35%	20.44%

Correlation

The correlation between LOPP and FFSM is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2021	0.90

The correlation between LOPP and FFSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

LOPP vs. FFSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LOPP	FFSM
Industrials	50.1%	29.5%
Utilities	16.5%	1.8%
Technology	8.5%	14.0%
Basic Materials	6.2%	6.2%
Consumer Cyclical	4.5%	12.2%
Energy	3.8%	2.2%
Healthcare	3.4%	9.1%
Real Estate	3.1%	0.0%
Financial Services	2.5%	22.7%
Communication Services	1.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	2.3%

Return for Risk

LOPP vs. FFSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOPP

LOPP Risk / Return Rank: 71
LOPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
LOPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
LOPP Omega Ratio Rank: 65
LOPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
LOPP Martin Ratio Rank: 76

FFSM

FFSM Risk / Return Rank: 78
FFSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FFSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FFSM Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FFSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FFSM Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOPP vs. FFSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) and Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LOPP	FFSM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	2.16	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	3.01	-0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.37	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	3.87	-0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.84	15.58	-2.74

LOPP vs. FFSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOPP Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the FFSM Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOPP and FFSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LOPP vs. FFSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOPP drawdown since its inception was -25.28%, smaller than the maximum FFSM drawdown of -26.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOPP and FFSM.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOPP	FFSM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.28%	-26.65%	+1.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.77%	-10.37%	+0.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.28%	-24.78%	+4.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.28%	-26.65%	+1.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	-0.87%	+0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.17%	-7.78%	-0.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	2.57%	+0.04%

Volatility

LOPP vs. FFSM - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) and Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) have volatilities of 6.30% and 6.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LOPP	FFSM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.30%	6.37%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.58%	14.65%	-1.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.87%	18.63%	-1.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.11%	20.76%	-2.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.74%	20.61%	-2.87%

LOPP vs. FFSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOPP has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FFSM's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

LOPP vs. FFSM - Dividend Comparison

LOPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than FFSM's 0.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF	0.43%	0.56%	0.62%	0.56%	0.58%	0.37%
LOPP Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF	0.70%	0.83%	1.88%	2.23%	2.01%	1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LOPP and FFSM in my portfolio?

LOPP and FFSM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LOPP or FFSM?

FFSM has higher volatility (6.37%) compared to LOPP (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOPP dropped -25.28% vs FFSM's -26.65%.

Which ETF is better, LOPP or FFSM?

On 5-year performance, FFSM leads with 10.98% vs 8.50% for LOPP. On fees, LOPP is cheaper at 0.00% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LOPP or FFSM?

Over the 5-year period, FFSM has performed better with a 10.98% return vs 8.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LOPP or FFSM?

LOPP is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FFSM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LOPP or FFSM?

LOPP has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.43% for FFSM.

What is the main difference between LOPP and FFSM?

They also come from different issuers: Gabelli and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for LOPP and 0.43% for FFSM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.