PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOPP vs. CVMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LOPP vs. CVMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) and Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LOPP vs. CVMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LOPP
Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF
4.90%22.61%9.89%-1.50%
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
0.08%9.52%12.57%4.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOPP achieves a 4.90% return, which is significantly higher than CVMC's 0.08% return.


LOPP

1D
3.09%
1M
-5.43%
YTD
4.90%
6M
7.80%
1Y
32.00%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*

CVMC

1D
2.84%
1M
-6.16%
YTD
0.08%
6M
1.53%
1Y
14.43%
3Y*
10.84%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LOPP vs. CVMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOPP has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CVMC's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

LOPP vs. CVMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOPP
LOPP Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
LOPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOPP Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
LOPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOPP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

CVMC
CVMC Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CVMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVMC Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
CVMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVMC Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOPP vs. CVMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) and Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LOPPCVMCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.70

0.73

+0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.38

1.20

+1.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.16

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

1.05

+1.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.96

4.92

+6.04

LOPP vs. CVMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOPP Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the CVMC Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOPP and CVMC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LOPPCVMCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

0.73

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.51

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between LOPP and CVMC is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

LOPP vs. CVMC - Dividend Comparison

LOPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than CVMC's 1.35% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
LOPP
Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF
0.79%0.83%1.88%2.23%2.01%1.25%
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
1.35%1.39%1.21%1.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LOPP vs. CVMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOPP drawdown since its inception was -25.28%, which is greater than CVMC's maximum drawdown of -22.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOPP and CVMC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LOPPCVMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.28%

-22.53%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-14.14%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.90%

-6.77%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.46%

-4.34%

-4.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

3.03%

-0.12%

Volatility

LOPP vs. CVMC - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) has a higher volatility of 7.24% compared to Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) at 5.78%. This indicates that LOPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LOPPCVMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.24%

5.78%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.79%

10.51%

+1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.94%

19.89%

-0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.75%

16.54%

+1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.61%

16.54%

+1.07%