PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LONGX vs. JAKVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LONGX vs. JAKVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LONGX achieves a 13.08% return, which is significantly higher than JAKVX's 11.50% return.


LONGX

1D
-0.35%
1M
0.65%
6M
10.07%
YTD
13.08%
1Y
15.71%
3Y*
11.02%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*
24.45%

JAKVX

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.72%
6M
9.79%
YTD
11.50%
1Y
20.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LONGX vs. JAKVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LONGX and JAKVX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LONGX vs. JAKVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LONGX
LONGX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
LONGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LONGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
LONGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
LONGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
LONGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

JAKVX
JAKVX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
JAKVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAKVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAKVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
JAKVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAKVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LONGX vs. JAKVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LONGXJAKVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.51

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

4.06

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.89

12.14

-3.25

LONGX vs. JAKVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LONGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the JAKVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LONGX and JAKVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LONGX vs. JAKVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LONGX drawdown since its inception was -77.16%, which is greater than JAKVX's maximum drawdown of -5.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LONGX and JAKVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LONGXJAKVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.16%

-5.16%

-72.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.09%

-5.16%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

-2.23%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.31%

-0.95%

-6.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.72%

+0.13%

Volatility

LONGX vs. JAKVX - Volatility Comparison

Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) at 2.49%. This indicates that LONGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAKVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LONGXJAKVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

2.49%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.43%

6.46%

+1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.94%

7.94%

+3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.89%

7.56%

+4.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

137.78%

7.56%

+130.22%

LONGX vs. JAKVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LONGX has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than JAKVX's 1.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

LONGX vs. JAKVX - Dividend Comparison

LONGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JAKVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.60%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
JAKVX
John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6
7.60%8.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LONGX
Longboard Alternative Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%5.40%7.64%1.73%0.00%0.00%3.10%268.50%23.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


LONGX and JAKVX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LONGX has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to JAKVX (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LONGX dropped -77.16% vs JAKVX's -5.16%.

JAKVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LONGX and JAKVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer