LOMA vs. SCHF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LOMA (Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima) is a stock, while SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Over the past 5 years, LOMA returned 18.40%/yr vs 9.84%/yr for SCHF. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LOMA vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOMA achieves a -12.74% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 15.56% return.

LOMA

• 1D: -1.99%
• 1M: 7.93%
• YTD: -12.74%
• 6M: -11.02%
• 1Y: -9.82%
• 3Y*: 24.13%
• 5Y*: 18.40%
• 10Y*: —

SCHF

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 5.91%
• YTD: 15.56%
• 6M: 18.62%
• 1Y: 32.67%
• 3Y*: 19.90%
• 5Y*: 9.84%
• 10Y*: 10.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOMA vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LOMA Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima	-12.74%	8.46%	68.41%	21.03%	26.57%	8.46%	-16.62%	-29.74%	-51.69%	7.92%
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	15.56%	34.55%	3.28%	18.35%	-14.80%	11.40%	9.48%	22.26%	-14.29%	2.12%

Correlation

The correlation between LOMA and SCHF is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2017	0.39

Return for Risk

LOMA vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOMA

LOMA Risk / Return Rank: 33
LOMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
LOMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
LOMA Omega Ratio Rank: 33
LOMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
LOMA Martin Ratio Rank: 31

SCHF

SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 59
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOMA vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LOMA	SCHF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.17	2.09	-2.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.17	2.87	-2.71
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.37	-0.36
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.23	2.86	-3.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.51	11.11	-11.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LOMA vs. SCHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOMA Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the SCHF Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOMA and SCHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LOMA	SCHF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17	2.09	-2.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.60	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.44	-0.48

Drawdowns

LOMA vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOMA drawdown since its inception was -87.17%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOMA and SCHF.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOMA	SCHF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.17%	-34.87%	-52.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.87%	-11.48%	-31.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.26%	-13.41%	-34.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.26%	-29.14%	-19.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.00%	-0.86%	-30.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.08%	-7.38%	-49.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.30%	2.95%	+16.35%

Volatility

LOMA vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison

Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA) has a higher volatility of 17.71% compared to Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) at 5.66%. This indicates that LOMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LOMA	SCHF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.71%	5.66%	+12.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.48%	13.34%	+17.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.97%	15.74%	+42.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.88%	16.39%	+29.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.22%	17.18%	+38.04%

Dividends

LOMA vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison

LOMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LOMA Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	14.64%	15.68%	0.00%	4.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	2.96%	3.42%	3.26%	2.97%	2.80%	3.19%	2.08%	2.95%	3.06%	2.35%	2.58%	2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LOMA and SCHF in my portfolio?

LOMA and SCHF have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LOMA or SCHF?

LOMA has higher volatility (17.71%) compared to SCHF (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOMA dropped -87.17% vs SCHF's -34.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.