PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOMA vs. YPF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LOMA vs. YPF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA) and YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOMA achieves a -12.74% return, which is significantly lower than YPF's 51.83% return.


LOMA

1D
-1.99%
1M
7.93%
YTD
-12.74%
6M
-11.02%
1Y
-9.82%
3Y*
24.13%
5Y*
18.40%
10Y*

YPF

1D
-0.74%
1M
23.57%
YTD
51.83%
6M
47.38%
1Y
55.44%
3Y*
68.48%
5Y*
59.01%
10Y*
10.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOMA vs. YPF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LOMA
Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima
-12.74%8.46%68.41%21.03%26.57%8.46%-16.62%-29.74%-51.69%7.92%
YPF
YPF Sociedad Anónima
51.83%-14.94%147.29%87.05%140.58%-18.72%-59.41%-12.86%-41.18%-6.49%

Correlation

The correlation between LOMA and YPF is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2017

0.55

The correlation between LOMA and YPF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LOMA:

$1.32B

YPF:

$21.53B

EPS

LOMA:

$336.44

YPF:

-$3.19K

PS Ratio

LOMA:

0.00

YPF:

0.00

PB Ratio

LOMA:

0.00

YPF:

1.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

LOMA:

$829.94B

YPF:

$13.23T

Gross Profit (TTM)

LOMA:

$182.35B

YPF:

$3.80T

EBITDA (TTM)

LOMA:

$174.03B

YPF:

$4.05T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOMA vs. YPF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOMA
LOMA Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
LOMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOMA Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
LOMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOMA Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

YPF
YPF Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
YPF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YPF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
YPF Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
YPF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
YPF Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOMA vs. YPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA) and YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LOMAYPFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.17

1.05

-1.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.17

1.81

-1.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.23

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

1.60

-1.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.51

4.31

-4.82

LOMA vs. YPF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOMA Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the YPF Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOMA and YPF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LOMAYPFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

1.05

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

1.08

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

0.17

-0.21

Drawdowns

LOMA vs. YPF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOMA drawdown since its inception was -87.17%, smaller than the maximum YPF drawdown of -94.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOMA and YPF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOMAYPFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.17%

-94.58%

+7.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.87%

-35.05%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.26%

-48.79%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.26%

-49.13%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.00%

-0.74%

-30.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.08%

-39.13%

-17.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.30%

12.95%

+6.35%

Volatility

LOMA vs. YPF - Volatility Comparison

Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA) has a higher volatility of 17.71% compared to YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) at 13.14%. This indicates that LOMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YPF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOMAYPFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.71%

13.14%

+4.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.48%

27.35%

+3.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.97%

53.59%

+4.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.88%

54.90%

-9.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.22%

54.71%

+0.51%

Dividends

LOMA vs. YPF - Dividend Comparison

Neither LOMA nor YPF has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LOMA
Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima
0.00%0.00%0.00%14.64%15.68%0.00%4.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YPF
YPF Sociedad Anónima
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.19%0.60%0.32%0.66%0.80%

Financials

LOMA vs. YPF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima and YPF Sociedad Anónima. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00T2.00T3.00T4.00T5.00T6.00T7.00TJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
218.74B
4.94B
(LOMA) Total Revenue
(YPF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LOMA vs. YPF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima and YPF Sociedad Anónima over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
26.1%
35.5%
Portfolio components
LOMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima reported a gross profit of 57.03B and revenue of 218.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.1%.

YPF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, YPF Sociedad Anónima reported a gross profit of 1.76B and revenue of 4.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.5%.

LOMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima reported an operating income of 30.51B and revenue of 218.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

YPF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, YPF Sociedad Anónima reported an operating income of 873.00M and revenue of 4.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.

LOMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima reported a net income of 41.00B and revenue of 218.74B, resulting in a net margin of 18.8%.

YPF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, YPF Sociedad Anónima reported a net income of 404.00M and revenue of 4.94B, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LOMA and YPF have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LOMA has higher volatility (17.71%) compared to YPF (13.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOMA dropped -87.17% vs YPF's -94.58%.

YPF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOMA and YPF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer