PortfoliosLab logo
LOMA vs. GGAL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LOMA and GGAL is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LOMA vs. GGAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA) and Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-20.66%
37.92%
LOMA
GGAL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LOMA:

0.98

GGAL:

1.43

Sortino Ratio

LOMA:

1.67

GGAL:

2.17

Omega Ratio

LOMA:

1.20

GGAL:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

LOMA:

0.79

GGAL:

1.53

Martin Ratio

LOMA:

4.19

GGAL:

6.21

Ulcer Index

LOMA:

11.87%

GGAL:

13.41%

Daily Std Dev

LOMA:

50.69%

GGAL:

57.84%

Max Drawdown

LOMA:

-87.17%

GGAL:

-98.98%

Current Drawdown

LOMA:

-32.30%

GGAL:

-19.21%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LOMA:

$1.32B

GGAL:

$7.78B

EPS

LOMA:

$1.12

GGAL:

$9.38

PE Ratio

LOMA:

9.93

GGAL:

6.26

PS Ratio

LOMA:

0.00

GGAL:

0.00

PB Ratio

LOMA:

1.92

GGAL:

1.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

LOMA:

$523.99B

GGAL:

$6.55T

Gross Profit (TTM)

LOMA:

$142.82B

GGAL:

$6.55T

EBITDA (TTM)

LOMA:

$132.71B

GGAL:

$665.32B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOMA achieves a -6.95% return, which is significantly lower than GGAL's -6.37% return.


LOMA

YTD

-6.95%

1M

16.70%

6M

12.45%

1Y

48.33%

5Y*

37.01%

10Y*

N/A

GGAL

YTD

-6.37%

1M

28.78%

6M

6.21%

1Y

76.41%

5Y*

55.57%

10Y*

13.59%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LOMA vs. GGAL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOMA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LOMA is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LOMA is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LOMA is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LOMA is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LOMA is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LOMA is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

GGAL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GGAL is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GGAL is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GGAL is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GGAL is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GGAL is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GGAL is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LOMA vs. GGAL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA) and Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LOMA Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the GGAL Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOMA and GGAL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.002.004.006.008.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.96
1.33
LOMA
GGAL

Dividends

LOMA vs. GGAL - Dividend Comparison

LOMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LOMA
Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima
0.00%0.00%14.43%15.68%0.00%4.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GGAL
Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A.
4.07%3.81%6.49%4.62%0.68%0.87%1.89%1.31%0.18%0.30%0.32%0.23%

Drawdowns

LOMA vs. GGAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOMA drawdown since its inception was -87.17%, smaller than the maximum GGAL drawdown of -98.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOMA and GGAL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-32.30%
-19.21%
LOMA
GGAL

Volatility

LOMA vs. GGAL - Volatility Comparison

Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA) and Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL) have volatilities of 23.12% and 23.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
23.12%
23.51%
LOMA
GGAL

Financials

LOMA vs. GGAL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima and Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00B1.00T1.50T2.00T20212022202320242025
174.17B
1.66T
(LOMA) Total Revenue
(GGAL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LOMA vs. GGAL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima and Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
32.6%
100.0%
(LOMA) Gross Margin
(GGAL) Gross Margin
LOMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima reported a gross profit of 56.73B and revenue of 174.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.6%.

GGAL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. reported a gross profit of 1.66T and revenue of 1.66T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

LOMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 174.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.

GGAL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. reported an operating income of 868.06B and revenue of 1.66T, resulting in an operating margin of 52.2%.

LOMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima reported a net income of 22.42B and revenue of 174.17B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.

GGAL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. reported a net income of 651.98B and revenue of 1.66T, resulting in a net margin of 39.2%.