LOHA vs. RAAX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

LOHA (Roundhill HALO ETF) and RAAX (VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LOHA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Akros U.S. Heavy Assets Low Obsolescence (HALO) Index, while RAAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by VanEck. LOHA is passively managed, while RAAX is actively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LOHA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for RAAX.

Performance

LOHA vs. RAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill HALO ETF (LOHA) and VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LOHA

• 1D: 2.19%
• 1M: 1.16%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RAAX

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: -3.04%
• 6M: 5.51%
• YTD: 12.31%
• 1Y: 26.07%
• 3Y*: 18.14%
• 5Y*: 13.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOHA vs. RAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
LOHA Roundhill HALO ETF	4.07%
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF	-7.50%

Correlation

The correlation between LOHA and RAAX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2026	0.29

Return for Risk

LOHA vs. RAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOHA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RAAX

RAAX Risk / Return Rank: 68
RAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
RAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
RAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
RAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
RAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOHA vs. RAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HALO ETF (LOHA) and VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LOHA	RAAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.78	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.39	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.97	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.09	—

Drawdowns

LOHA vs. RAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOHA drawdown since its inception was -2.48%, smaller than the maximum RAAX drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOHA and RAAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOHA	RAAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.48%	-33.91%	+31.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.81%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.59%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-8.13%	+8.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.87%	-6.77%	+5.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.88%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LOHA	RAAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.62%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.50%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.50%	14.70%	-0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.50%	15.72%	-1.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.50%	15.79%	-1.29%

LOHA vs. RAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOHA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RAAX's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

LOHA vs. RAAX - Dividend Comparison

LOHA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LOHA Roundhill HALO ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF	2.08%	2.34%	1.91%	3.66%	1.53%	8.72%	6.27%	2.37%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LOHA and RAAX in my portfolio?

LOHA and RAAX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LOHA or RAAX?

On fees, LOHA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LOHA or RAAX?

LOHA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for RAAX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LOHA or RAAX?

RAAX has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.00% for LOHA.

What is the main difference between LOHA and RAAX?

LOHA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while RAAX is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for LOHA and 0.89% for RAAX.