LOHA vs. PLTW

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

LOHA (Roundhill HALO ETF) and PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LOHA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Akros U.S. Heavy Assets Low Obsolescence (HALO) Index, while PLTW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. LOHA is passively managed, while PLTW is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. LOHA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PLTW.

Performance

LOHA vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill HALO ETF (LOHA) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LOHA

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLTW

• 1D: -5.71%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: -30.46%
• 6M: -32.92%
• 1Y: 6.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOHA vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
LOHA Roundhill HALO ETF	-0.44%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	0.83%

Correlation

The correlation between LOHA and PLTW is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2026	-0.21

Return for Risk

LOHA vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 12
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 14
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOHA vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HALO ETF (LOHA) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LOHA	PLTW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.62	0.11	-0.74

Drawdowns

LOHA vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOHA drawdown since its inception was -2.08%, smaller than the maximum PLTW drawdown of -46.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOHA and PLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOHA	PLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.08%	-46.29%	+44.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-46.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	-43.12%	+41.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.81%	-19.70%	+18.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	25.46%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LOHA	PLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	21.05%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	46.37%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.84%	61.91%	-50.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.84%	72.80%	-60.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.84%	72.80%	-60.96%

LOHA vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOHA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

LOHA vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

LOHA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 128.71%.

Position	TTM	2025
LOHA Roundhill HALO ETF	0.00%	0.00%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	128.71%	72.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LOHA and PLTW in my portfolio?

LOHA and PLTW have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LOHA or PLTW?

On fees, LOHA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LOHA or PLTW?

LOHA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LOHA or PLTW?

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 128.71%, compared with 0.00% for LOHA.

What is the main difference between LOHA and PLTW?

LOHA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PLTW is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for LOHA and 0.99% for PLTW.