LODI vs. SCHJ
LODI (AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF) and SCHJ (Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. LODI is actively managed, while SCHJ is passively managed. Over the past year, LODI returned 4.66% vs 2.99% for SCHJ. Their 0.50 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LODI charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHJ.
Performance
LODI vs. SCHJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LODI achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly higher than SCHJ's 0.75% return.
LODI
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 1Y
- 4.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.31%
SCHJ
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- 2.99%
- 3Y*
- 5.46%
- 5Y*
- 2.31%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $236.09K | $200.53K | $410.28K | |
| $5.98M | $7.81M | $6.46M |
LODI vs. SCHJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LODI AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF | 2.32% | 6.04% | 0.40% |
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 0.75% | 6.80% | -0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between LODI and SCHJ is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024 | 0.50 |
The correlation between LODI and SCHJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LODI vs. SCHJ — Risk / Return Rank
LODI
SCHJ
LODI vs. SCHJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF (LODI) and Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LODI | SCHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.35 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.70 | 2.44 | +4.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.71 | 9.17 | +10.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LODI vs. SCHJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LODI drawdown since its inception was -1.01%, smaller than the maximum SCHJ drawdown of -13.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LODI and SCHJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LODI | SCHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.01% | -13.62% | +12.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.75% | -1.47% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.33% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.19% | -1.85% | +1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.25% | 0.39% | -0.14% |
Volatility
LODI vs. SCHJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF (LODI) is 0.33%, while Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) has a volatility of 0.53%. This indicates that LODI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LODI | SCHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.33% | 0.53% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.08% | 1.53% | -0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09% | 1.93% | +0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.26% | 2.95% | -0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.26% | 4.10% | -1.84% |
LODI vs. SCHJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
LODI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHJ's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LODI vs. SCHJ - Dividend Comparison
LODI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than SCHJ's 4.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LODI AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF | 5.00% | 5.11% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 4.09% | 4.42% | 4.00% | 2.98% | 1.64% | 0.94% | 2.54% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LODI and SCHJ have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHJ has higher volatility (0.53%) compared to LODI (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LODI dropped -1.01% vs SCHJ's -13.62%.
On 1-year performance, LODI leads with 4.66% vs 2.99% for SCHJ. On fees, SCHJ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, LODI has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LODI has performed better with a 4.66% return vs 2.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHJ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for LODI.
LODI has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 4.09% for SCHJ.
They also come from different issuers: AAM and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for LODI and 0.03% for SCHJ.
LODI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LODI and SCHJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer