LODI vs. BSV
LODI (AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF) and BSV (Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares) are both Short-Term Bond funds. LODI is actively managed, while BSV is passively managed. Over the past year, LODI returned 6.73% vs 4.17% for BSV. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LODI charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BSV.
Performance
LODI vs. BSV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LODI achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly higher than BSV's 0.44% return.
LODI
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 6.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSV
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 4.17%
- 3Y*
- 4.43%
- 5Y*
- 1.71%
- 10Y*
- 1.99%
LODI vs. BSV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LODI AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF | 1.25% | 6.04% | 0.26% |
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 0.44% | 6.00% | -0.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between LODI and BSV is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024 | 0.54 |
The correlation between LODI and BSV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LODI vs. BSV — Risk / Return Rank
LODI
BSV
LODI vs. BSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF (LODI) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LODI | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.64 | 2.26 | +0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.95 | 3.57 | +0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.44 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.71 | 3.51 | +5.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.17 | 13.18 | +8.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LODI | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 2.26 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.32 | 0.86 | +1.46 |
Drawdowns
LODI vs. BSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LODI drawdown since its inception was -1.01%, smaller than the maximum BSV drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LODI and BSV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LODI | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.01% | -8.54% | +7.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.75% | -1.29% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -8.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -8.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.48% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.22% | -0.97% | +0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.29% | 0.34% | -0.05% |
Volatility
LODI vs. BSV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF (LODI) is 0.38%, while Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) has a volatility of 0.73%. This indicates that LODI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LODI | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.38% | 0.73% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.26% | 1.18% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58% | 1.87% | +0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.42% | 2.71% | -0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.42% | 2.37% | +0.05% |
LODI vs. BSV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LODI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BSV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LODI vs. BSV - Dividend Comparison
LODI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than BSV's 3.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LODI AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF | 4.99% | 5.11% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 3.92% | 3.83% | 3.38% | 2.46% | 1.50% | 1.45% | 1.79% | 2.29% | 1.99% | 1.65% | 1.48% | 1.40% |