LNT vs. CPK
LNT (Alliant Energy Corporation) and CPK (Chesapeake Utilities Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Utilities sector — LNT in Utilities - Regulated Electric, CPK in Utilities - Regulated Gas. Over the past 10 years, LNT returned 9.75%/yr vs 9.57%/yr for CPK. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LNT vs. CPK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNT achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly higher than CPK's -1.46% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LNT having a 9.75% annualized return and CPK not far behind at 9.57%.
LNT
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -4.19%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 8.33%
- 1Y
- 17.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.75%
- 5Y*
- 7.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
CPK
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -3.66%
- YTD
- -1.46%
- 6M
- -7.34%
- 1Y
- 2.57%
- 3Y*
- 0.10%
- 5Y*
- 2.86%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
LNT vs. CPK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNT Alliant Energy Corporation | 10.86% | 13.52% | 19.54% | -3.84% | -7.44% | 22.86% | -3.16% | 33.43% | 2.37% | 16.05% |
CPK Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | -1.46% | 5.07% | 17.44% | -8.83% | -17.61% | 36.78% | 15.15% | 19.88% | 5.37% | 19.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNT and CPK is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, LNT and CPK have become more correlated (0.54) than their long-term average of 0.31, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
LNT:
$18.36B
CPK:
$2.94B
LNT:
$2.94
CPK:
$3.21
LNT:
24.11
CPK:
38.11
LNT:
4.95
CPK:
6.04
LNT:
4.15
CPK:
4.88
LNT:
$4.42B
CPK:
$586.05M
LNT:
$2.26B
CPK:
$313.50M
LNT:
$2.00B
CPK:
$224.92M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNT vs. CPK — Risk / Return Rank
LNT
CPK
LNT vs. CPK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) and Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LNT | CPK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 0.14 | +1.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.66 | 0.32 | +1.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.04 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 0.18 | +2.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.95 | 0.39 | +5.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LNT | CPK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 0.14 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.13 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.36 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.33 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
LNT vs. CPK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNT drawdown since its inception was -51.66%, which is greater than CPK's maximum drawdown of -44.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNT and CPK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNT | CPK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.66% | -44.54% | -7.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -12.54% | +5.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.35% | -33.53% | +17.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.60% | -38.67% | +13.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.54% | -38.67% | +5.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.19% | -11.12% | +6.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.75% | -8.82% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 5.85% | -2.89% |
Volatility
LNT vs. CPK - Volatility Comparison
Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) at 5.08%. This indicates that LNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNT | CPK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.82% | 5.08% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.99% | 14.14% | -2.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.49% | 18.67% | -3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.72% | 22.77% | -3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.18% | 26.64% | -5.46% |
Dividends
LNT vs. CPK - Dividend Comparison
LNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than CPK's 2.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPK Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 2.24% | 2.16% | 2.07% | 2.18% | 1.76% | 1.29% | 1.59% | 1.65% | 1.77% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% |
LNT Alliant Energy Corporation | 2.94% | 3.12% | 3.25% | 3.53% | 3.10% | 2.62% | 2.95% | 2.60% | 3.17% | 2.96% | 3.10% | 3.52% |
Financials
LNT vs. CPK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alliant Energy Corporation and Chesapeake Utilities Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LNT vs. CPK - Profitability Comparison
LNT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliant Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.00B and revenue of 1.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.8%.
CPK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 353.10K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LNT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliant Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 249.00M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.
CPK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation reported an operating income of 99.40K and revenue of 353.10K, resulting in an operating margin of 28.2%.
LNT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliant Energy Corporation reported a net income of 163.00M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in a net margin of 13.8%.
CPK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation reported a net income of 59.30K and revenue of 353.10K, resulting in a net margin of 16.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LNT and CPK have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LNT has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to CPK (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNT dropped -51.66% vs CPK's -44.54%.
LNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LNT and CPK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer