PortfoliosLab logo
LNT vs. CMS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LNT and CMS is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.3

Performance

LNT vs. CMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

1,500.00%2,000.00%2,500.00%3,000.00%3,500.00%4,000.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
3,517.63%
1,431.83%
LNT
CMS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LNT:

1.36

CMS:

1.42

Sortino Ratio

LNT:

1.88

CMS:

1.92

Omega Ratio

LNT:

1.26

CMS:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

LNT:

1.39

CMS:

1.70

Martin Ratio

LNT:

6.11

CMS:

6.04

Ulcer Index

LNT:

4.24%

CMS:

4.01%

Daily Std Dev

LNT:

19.02%

CMS:

17.07%

Max Drawdown

LNT:

-51.66%

CMS:

-91.20%

Current Drawdown

LNT:

-8.03%

CMS:

-4.41%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LNT:

$15.75B

CMS:

$22.18B

EPS

LNT:

$2.69

CMS:

$3.38

PE Ratio

LNT:

22.58

CMS:

21.36

PEG Ratio

LNT:

1.96

CMS:

2.92

PS Ratio

LNT:

3.96

CMS:

2.85

PB Ratio

LNT:

2.25

CMS:

2.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

LNT:

$2.95B

CMS:

$7.79B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LNT:

$1.40B

CMS:

$4.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

LNT:

$1.35B

CMS:

$3.15B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNT achieves a 3.59% return, which is significantly lower than CMS's 9.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LNT having a 10.41% annualized return and CMS not far ahead at 10.88%.


LNT

YTD

3.59%

1M

-3.77%

6M

1.69%

1Y

26.85%

5Y*

7.23%

10Y*

10.41%

CMS

YTD

9.15%

1M

-1.33%

6M

3.59%

1Y

25.52%

5Y*

7.71%

10Y*

10.88%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LNT vs. CMS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LNT is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LNT is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LNT is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LNT is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LNT is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LNT is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

CMS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMS is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMS is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMS is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMS is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMS is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMS is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LNT vs. CMS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for LNT, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
LNT: 1.36
CMS: 1.42
The chart of Sortino ratio for LNT, currently valued at 1.88, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
LNT: 1.88
CMS: 1.92
The chart of Omega ratio for LNT, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
LNT: 1.26
CMS: 1.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for LNT, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
LNT: 1.39
CMS: 1.70
The chart of Martin ratio for LNT, currently valued at 6.11, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
LNT: 6.11
CMS: 6.04

The current LNT Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the CMS Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNT and CMS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.36
1.42
LNT
CMS

Dividends

LNT vs. CMS - Dividend Comparison

LNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than CMS's 2.89% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LNT
Alliant Energy Corporation
3.21%3.25%3.53%3.10%2.62%2.95%2.60%3.17%2.96%3.10%3.52%3.07%
CMS
CMS Energy Corporation
2.89%3.09%3.36%2.91%2.67%2.67%2.43%2.88%2.81%2.98%3.22%3.11%

Drawdowns

LNT vs. CMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNT drawdown since its inception was -51.66%, smaller than the maximum CMS drawdown of -91.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNT and CMS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-8.03%
-4.41%
LNT
CMS

Volatility

LNT vs. CMS - Volatility Comparison

Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) has a higher volatility of 8.82% compared to CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) at 7.35%. This indicates that LNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
8.82%
7.35%
LNT
CMS

Financials

LNT vs. CMS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alliant Energy Corporation and CMS Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items