LNT vs. CMS
LNT (Alliant Energy Corporation) and CMS (CMS Energy Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Utilities - Regulated Electric industry within the Utilities sector. Over the past 10 years, LNT returned 9.82%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for CMS. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
LNT vs. CMS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNT achieves a 14.38% return, which is significantly higher than CMS's 7.15% return. Over the past 10 years, LNT has outperformed CMS with an annualized return of 9.82%, while CMS has yielded a comparatively lower 8.46% annualized return.
LNT
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- 14.38%
- 6M
- 14.34%
- 1Y
- 24.72%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.70%
- 10Y*
- 9.82%
CMS
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- 7.15%
- 6M
- 7.40%
- 1Y
- 10.14%
- 3Y*
- 11.48%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.46%
LNT vs. CMS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNT Alliant Energy Corporation | 14.38% | 13.52% | 19.54% | -3.84% | -7.44% | 22.86% | -3.16% | 33.43% | 2.37% | 16.05% |
CMS CMS Energy Corporation | 7.15% | 8.13% | 18.60% | -5.21% | 0.84% | 9.71% | -0.32% | 30.04% | 8.25% | 17.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNT and CMS is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1988 | 0.52 |
Over the past year, LNT and CMS have become more correlated (0.82) than their long-term average of 0.52, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
LNT:
$2.94
CMS:
$4.92
LNT:
24.87
CMS:
15.00
LNT:
4.28
CMS:
1.88
LNT:
$4.42B
CMS:
$8.82B
LNT:
$2.26B
CMS:
$4.16B
LNT:
$2.00B
CMS:
$3.09B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNT vs. CMS — Risk / Return Rank
LNT
CMS
LNT vs. CMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LNT | CMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.12 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 0.89 | +2.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.44 | 2.25 | +6.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LNT vs. CMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNT drawdown since its inception was -51.66%, smaller than the maximum CMS drawdown of -91.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNT and CMS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNT | CMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.66% | -91.20% | +39.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -11.48% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.35% | -19.61% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.60% | -27.56% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.54% | -29.55% | -3.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -6.96% | +5.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.74% | -27.33% | +18.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 4.51% | -1.57% |
Volatility
LNT vs. CMS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) is 5.81%, while CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that LNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNT | CMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 6.46% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.89% | 12.45% | -0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.62% | 16.22% | -0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.68% | 18.93% | +0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.20% | 20.72% | +0.48% |
Dividends
LNT vs. CMS - Dividend Comparison
LNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than CMS's 3.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMS CMS Energy Corporation | 3.01% | 3.10% | 3.09% | 3.36% | 3.62% | 2.67% | 2.67% | 2.43% | 2.88% | 2.81% | 2.98% | 3.22% |
LNT Alliant Energy Corporation | 2.85% | 3.12% | 3.25% | 3.53% | 3.10% | 2.62% | 2.95% | 2.60% | 3.17% | 2.96% | 3.10% | 3.52% |
Financials
LNT vs. CMS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alliant Energy Corporation and CMS Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LNT vs. CMS - Profitability Comparison
LNT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliant Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.00B and revenue of 1.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.8%.
CMS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMS Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LNT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliant Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 249.00M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.
CMS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMS Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 490.00M and revenue of 2.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.0%.
LNT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliant Energy Corporation reported a net income of 163.00M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in a net margin of 13.8%.
CMS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMS Energy Corporation reported a net income of 340.00M and revenue of 2.73B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LNT and CMS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMS has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to LNT (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNT dropped -51.66% vs CMS's -91.20%.
LNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LNT and CMS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer