LNT vs. CMS
Compare and contrast key facts about Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LNT or CMS.
Correlation
The correlation between LNT and CMS is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
LNT vs. CMS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LNT:
1.22
CMS:
1.26
LNT:
1.76
CMS:
1.79
LNT:
1.23
CMS:
1.22
LNT:
0.97
CMS:
1.02
LNT:
5.37
CMS:
5.99
LNT:
4.03%
CMS:
3.43%
LNT:
17.71%
CMS:
16.30%
LNT:
-51.66%
CMS:
-91.20%
LNT:
-7.36%
CMS:
-6.91%
Fundamentals
LNT:
$15.29B
CMS:
$20.03B
LNT:
$2.57
CMS:
$3.51
LNT:
23.18
CMS:
19.10
LNT:
2.36
CMS:
2.43
LNT:
$3.97B
CMS:
$7.48B
LNT:
$1.22B
CMS:
$2.52B
LNT:
$1.73B
CMS:
$3.03B
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LNT having a 19.15% return and CMS slightly lower at 18.53%. Over the past 10 years, LNT has underperformed CMS with an annualized return of 9.38%, while CMS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.95% annualized return.
LNT
19.15%
-5.27%
17.65%
20.87%
4.68%
9.38%
CMS
18.53%
-2.79%
13.59%
20.95%
4.16%
9.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LNT vs. CMS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LNT vs. CMS - Dividend Comparison
LNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than CMS's 3.09% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNT Alliant Energy Corporation | 3.26% | 3.53% | 3.10% | 2.62% | 2.95% | 2.60% | 3.17% | 2.96% | 3.10% | 3.52% | 3.07% | 3.64% |
CMS CMS Energy Corporation | 3.09% | 3.36% | 2.91% | 2.67% | 2.67% | 2.43% | 2.88% | 2.81% | 2.98% | 3.22% | 3.11% | 3.81% |
Drawdowns
LNT vs. CMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNT drawdown since its inception was -51.66%, smaller than the maximum CMS drawdown of -91.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNT and CMS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LNT vs. CMS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) is 3.87%, while CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that LNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
LNT vs. CMS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alliant Energy Corporation and CMS Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities