PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LNT vs. CMS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

LNT vs. CMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LNT vs. CMS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LNT
Alliant Energy Corporation
11.28%13.52%19.54%-3.84%-7.44%22.86%-3.16%33.43%2.37%16.05%
CMS
CMS Energy Corporation
11.77%8.13%18.60%-5.21%0.84%9.71%-0.32%30.04%8.25%17.03%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LNT:

$18.57B

CMS:

$23.31B

EPS

LNT:

$3.14

CMS:

$3.57

PE Ratio

LNT:

22.85

CMS:

21.73

PS Ratio

LNT:

4.24

CMS:

2.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

LNT:

$4.36B

CMS:

$8.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LNT:

$1.75B

CMS:

$2.35B

EBITDA (TTM)

LNT:

$1.97B

CMS:

$2.95B

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LNT having a 11.28% return and CMS slightly higher at 11.77%. Over the past 10 years, LNT has outperformed CMS with an annualized return of 10.12%, while CMS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.41% annualized return.


LNT

1D
0.38%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
11.28%
6M
8.13%
1Y
15.11%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
10.12%

CMS

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
11.77%
6M
7.50%
1Y
6.41%
3Y*
11.62%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*
9.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LNT vs. CMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNT
LNT Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
LNT Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
LNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
LNT Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

CMS
CMS Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMS Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
CMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMS Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNT vs. CMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LNTCMSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

0.39

+0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.24

0.62

+0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.08

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

0.91

+0.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.22

1.70

+2.52

LNT vs. CMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LNT Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the CMS Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNT and CMS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LNTCMSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

0.39

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.44

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.46

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.35

+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between LNT and CMS is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

LNT vs. CMS - Dividend Comparison

LNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than CMS's 2.83% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LNT
Alliant Energy Corporation
2.87%3.12%3.25%3.53%3.10%2.62%2.95%2.60%3.17%2.96%3.10%3.52%
CMS
CMS Energy Corporation
2.83%3.10%3.09%3.36%3.62%2.67%2.67%2.43%2.88%2.81%2.98%3.22%

Drawdowns

LNT vs. CMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNT drawdown since its inception was -51.66%, smaller than the maximum CMS drawdown of -91.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNT and CMS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LNTCMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.66%

-91.20%

+39.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.34%

-8.51%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.60%

-27.56%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.54%

-29.55%

-3.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-0.91%

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.78%

-27.45%

+18.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

4.55%

-0.64%

Volatility

LNT vs. CMS - Volatility Comparison

Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) have volatilities of 5.26% and 5.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LNTCMSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

5.46%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.68%

11.15%

-0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

16.71%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.66%

18.83%

+0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.18%

20.65%

+0.53%

Financials

LNT vs. CMS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alliant Energy Corporation and CMS Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
1.06B
2.23B
(LNT) Total Revenue
(CMS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LNT vs. CMS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alliant Energy Corporation and CMS Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
42.0%
0
Portfolio components
LNT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alliant Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 447.00M and revenue of 1.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.0%.

CMS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CMS Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LNT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alliant Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 196.00M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.

CMS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CMS Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 435.00M and revenue of 2.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.

LNT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alliant Energy Corporation reported a net income of 142.00M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in a net margin of 13.4%.

CMS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CMS Energy Corporation reported a net income of 289.00M and revenue of 2.23B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.