PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LNGX vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LNGX vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNGX achieves a 20.47% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 32.17% return.


LNGX

1D
0.76%
1M
-6.84%
YTD
20.47%
6M
13.78%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XLE

1D
1.29%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
32.17%
6M
29.80%
1Y
45.00%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
10.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LNGX vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LNGX and XLE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025

0.85

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LNGX vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNGX

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNGX vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LNGX vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LNGXXLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.10

0.31

+1.79

Drawdowns

LNGX vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNGX drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNGX and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LNGXXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.31%

-71.26%

+56.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.36%

-6.15%

-5.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-17.98%

+13.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

Volatility

LNGX vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LNGXXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.67%

20.53%

+4.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.67%

26.02%

-1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.67%

29.59%

-4.92%

LNGX vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LNGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

LNGX vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

LNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than XLE's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LNGX
Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF
0.22%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


LNGX and XLE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LNGX.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.22% for LNGX.

LNGX tracks Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LNGX and 0.08% for XLE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LNGX and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer