LNGX vs. URA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LNGX (Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LNGX is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index, while URA is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. LNGX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.

Performance

LNGX vs. URA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNGX achieves a 20.47% return, which is significantly higher than URA's 17.93% return.

LNGX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -6.84%
• YTD: 20.47%
• 6M: 13.78%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

URA

• 1D: -5.67%
• 1M: -8.00%
• YTD: 17.93%
• 6M: 13.25%
• 1Y: 61.26%
• 3Y*: 39.27%
• 5Y*: 21.39%
• 10Y*: 17.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LNGX vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF	20.47%	5.97%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	17.93%	-20.72%

Correlation

The correlation between LNGX and URA is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

LNGX vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URA

URA Risk / Return Rank: 34
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 31
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNGX vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LNGX	URA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.10	-0.05	+2.15

Drawdowns

LNGX vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNGX drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNGX and URA.

Drawdown Indicators

	LNGX	URA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.31%	-93.54%	+79.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-28.43%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-37.81%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.90%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.36%	-42.81%	+31.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.37%	-75.01%	+70.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	13.40%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LNGX	URA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	15.94%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	38.29%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.67%	50.19%	-25.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.67%	43.62%	-18.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.67%	37.73%	-13.06%

LNGX vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison

LNGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

LNGX vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

LNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than URA's 4.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF	0.22%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	4.14%	4.88%	2.86%	6.07%	0.76%	5.84%	1.69%	1.66%	0.44%	2.03%	7.28%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LNGX and URA in my portfolio?

LNGX and URA have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LNGX or URA?

On fees, LNGX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LNGX or URA?

LNGX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LNGX or URA?

URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.14%, compared with 0.22% for LNGX.

What is the main difference between LNGX and URA?

LNGX is categorized as Energy Equities, while URA is Commodity Producers Equities. LNGX tracks Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index, while URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LNGX and 0.69% for URA.