LNGX vs. BSMU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LNGX (Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF) and BSMU (Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LNGX is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index, while BSMU is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco Bulletshares Municipal Bond 2030 Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. LNGX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMU.

Performance

LNGX vs. BSMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNGX achieves a 20.47% return, which is significantly higher than BSMU's 0.56% return.

LNGX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -6.84%
• YTD: 20.47%
• 6M: 13.78%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BSMU

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 0.56%
• 6M: 0.90%
• 1Y: 5.50%
• 3Y*: 3.02%
• 5Y*: -0.68%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LNGX vs. BSMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF	20.47%	5.97%
BSMU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF	0.56%	0.63%

Correlation

The correlation between LNGX and BSMU is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025	-0.28

Return for Risk

LNGX vs. BSMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMU

BSMU Risk / Return Rank: 72
BSMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
BSMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
BSMU Omega Ratio Rank: 89
BSMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
BSMU Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNGX vs. BSMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LNGX	BSMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.10	0.06	+2.03

Drawdowns

LNGX vs. BSMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNGX drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, smaller than the maximum BSMU drawdown of -19.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNGX and BSMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	LNGX	BSMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.31%	-19.48%	+5.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.06%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.92%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.36%	-4.83%	-6.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.37%	-8.20%	+3.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.67%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LNGX	BSMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.79%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.48%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.67%	2.13%	+22.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.67%	4.83%	+19.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.67%	4.85%	+19.82%

LNGX vs. BSMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

LNGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMU's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

LNGX vs. BSMU - Dividend Comparison

LNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than BSMU's 2.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BSMU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF	2.80%	2.82%	2.92%	2.66%	2.16%	1.60%	0.28%
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF	0.22%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LNGX and BSMU in my portfolio?

LNGX and BSMU have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LNGX or BSMU?

On fees, BSMU is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LNGX or BSMU?

BSMU is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LNGX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LNGX or BSMU?

BSMU has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 0.22% for LNGX.

What is the main difference between LNGX and BSMU?

LNGX is categorized as Energy Equities, while BSMU is Municipal Bonds. LNGX tracks Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index, while BSMU tracks Invesco Bulletshares Municipal Bond 2030 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LNGX and 0.18% for BSMU.