LMT vs. AGG
LMT (Lockheed Martin Corporation) is a stock, while AGG (iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) is Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Over the past 10 years, LMT returned 10.91%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for AGG. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
LMT vs. AGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMT achieves a 8.80% return, which is significantly higher than AGG's -0.08% return. Over the past 10 years, LMT has outperformed AGG with an annualized return of 10.91%, while AGG has yielded a comparatively lower 1.52% annualized return.
LMT
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 8.80%
- 6M
- 13.08%
- 1Y
- 10.88%
- 3Y*
- 6.80%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
AGG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 4.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.88%
- 5Y*
- -0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.52%
LMT vs. AGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 8.80% | 2.47% | 10.02% | -4.31% | 40.48% | 3.15% | -6.49% | 52.55% | -16.35% | 31.77% |
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | -0.08% | 7.19% | 1.31% | 5.65% | -13.02% | -1.77% | 7.48% | 8.46% | 0.09% | 3.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMT and AGG is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2003 | -0.08 |
The correlation between LMT and AGG shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.09 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMT vs. AGG — Risk / Return Rank
LMT
AGG
LMT vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LMT | AGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.23 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 1.81 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.04 | 5.44 | -4.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMT | AGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 1.32 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | -0.00 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.28 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.59 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
LMT vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMT drawdown since its inception was -79.29%, which is greater than AGG's maximum drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMT and AGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMT | AGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.29% | -18.43% | -60.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.15% | -2.76% | -22.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.79% | -6.11% | -25.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.79% | -17.82% | -13.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.67% | -18.43% | -18.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.64% | -2.47% | -20.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.84% | -2.71% | -24.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.51% | 0.92% | +9.59% |
Volatility
LMT vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison
Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) at 1.29%. This indicates that LMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMT | AGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.31% | 1.29% | +4.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.60% | 2.77% | +16.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.62% | 3.80% | +22.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.88% | 6.09% | +16.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.72% | 5.41% | +18.31% |
Dividends
LMT vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison
LMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than AGG's 4.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.00% | 3.89% | 3.74% | 3.13% | 2.39% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 2.70% | 2.72% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 2.62% | 2.76% | 2.62% | 2.68% | 2.34% | 2.98% | 2.76% | 2.31% | 3.13% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LMT and AGG have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LMT has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to AGG (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMT dropped -79.29% vs AGG's -18.43%.
AGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LMT and AGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer