LMOPX vs. RSINX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LMOPX (Miller Opportunity Trust) and RSINX (Victory RS Investors Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LMOPX returned 12.58%/yr vs 10.40%/yr for RSINX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LMOPX charges 1.95%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for RSINX.

Performance

LMOPX vs. RSINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Miller Opportunity Trust (LMOPX) and Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMOPX achieves a 5.67% return, which is significantly lower than RSINX's 6.06% return. Over the past 10 years, LMOPX has outperformed RSINX with an annualized return of 12.58%, while RSINX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.40% annualized return.

LMOPX

• 1D: -2.19%
• 1M: -0.02%
• YTD: 5.67%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 39.88%
• 3Y*: 25.89%
• 5Y*: 3.02%
• 10Y*: 12.58%

RSINX

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 0.11%
• YTD: 6.06%
• 6M: 7.03%
• 1Y: 14.19%
• 3Y*: 14.23%
• 5Y*: 9.41%
• 10Y*: 10.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMOPX vs. RSINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LMOPX Miller Opportunity Trust	5.67%	26.41%	25.40%	38.10%	-36.67%	-3.97%	37.56%	32.94%	-10.47%	25.00%
RSINX Victory RS Investors Fund	6.06%	6.39%	20.81%	13.18%	-2.02%	25.73%	-1.68%	28.02%	-9.55%	16.36%

Correlation

The correlation between LMOPX and RSINX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006	0.78

The correlation between LMOPX and RSINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LMOPX vs. RSINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMOPX

LMOPX Risk / Return Rank: 43
LMOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
LMOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
LMOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
LMOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
LMOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

RSINX

RSINX Risk / Return Rank: 21
RSINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
RSINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
RSINX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
RSINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
RSINX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMOPX vs. RSINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Miller Opportunity Trust (LMOPX) and Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LMOPX	RSINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	1.26	+0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	1.86	+0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.22	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	1.74	+0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.24	6.20	+3.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LMOPX vs. RSINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMOPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the RSINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMOPX and RSINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LMOPX	RSINX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.99	1.26	+0.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11	0.49	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	0.55	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.40	-0.13

Drawdowns

LMOPX vs. RSINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMOPX drawdown since its inception was -81.54%, which is greater than RSINX's maximum drawdown of -66.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMOPX and RSINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LMOPX	RSINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.54%	-66.11%	-15.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.96%	-8.64%	-7.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.19%	-20.23%	-8.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.85%	-23.08%	-29.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.03%	-40.86%	-12.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.72%	-1.74%	-0.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.17%	-10.56%	-10.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.51%	2.42%	+2.09%

Volatility

LMOPX vs. RSINX - Volatility Comparison

Miller Opportunity Trust (LMOPX) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX) at 2.66%. This indicates that LMOPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LMOPX	RSINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.96%	2.66%	+2.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.86%	8.29%	+6.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.02%	11.93%	+9.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.12%	19.11%	+9.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.86%	19.10%	+9.76%

LMOPX vs. RSINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMOPX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than RSINX's 1.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

LMOPX vs. RSINX - Dividend Comparison

LMOPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LMOPX Miller Opportunity Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	14.45%	1.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSINX Victory RS Investors Fund	4.20%	4.46%	10.21%	0.77%	4.03%	15.89%	0.30%	4.32%	17.89%	14.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LMOPX and RSINX in my portfolio?

LMOPX and RSINX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LMOPX or RSINX?

LMOPX has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to RSINX (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMOPX dropped -81.54% vs RSINX's -66.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LMOPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.