LMOPX vs. QCGDX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Miller Opportunity Trust (LMOPX) and Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX).

LMOPX is managed by Miller Value Funds. It was launched on Dec 30, 1999. QCGDX is managed by Advisors Preferred. It was launched on Dec 26, 2019.

Performance

LMOPX vs. QCGDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Miller Opportunity Trust (LMOPX) and Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LMOPX vs. QCGDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LMOPX Miller Opportunity Trust	-10.59%	26.41%	25.40%	38.10%	-36.67%	-3.97%	37.56%	0.98%
QCGDX Quantified Common Ground Fund	2.93%	1.02%	9.87%	14.74%	-12.23%	32.19%	14.65%	0.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMOPX achieves a -10.59% return, which is significantly lower than QCGDX's 2.93% return.

LMOPX

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -10.02%
• YTD: -10.59%
• 6M: -5.14%
• 1Y: 24.98%
• 3Y*: 21.18%
• 5Y*: 0.45%
• 10Y*: 10.57%

QCGDX

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: -4.57%
• YTD: 2.93%
• 6M: 4.54%
• 1Y: 6.11%
• 3Y*: 9.12%
• 5Y*: 7.01%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMOPX vs. QCGDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMOPX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QCGDX's 1.68% expense ratio.

LMOPX

Miller Opportunity Trust

QCGDX

Quantified Common Ground Fund

Return for Risk

LMOPX vs. QCGDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMOPX

LMOPX Risk / Return Rank: 41
LMOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
LMOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
LMOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
LMOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
LMOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

QCGDX

QCGDX Risk / Return Rank: 21
QCGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
QCGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
QCGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
QCGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
QCGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMOPX vs. QCGDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Miller Opportunity Trust (LMOPX) and Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LMOPX	QCGDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	0.54	+0.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.33	0.83	+0.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.11	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.16	0.72	+0.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.87	2.84	+1.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LMOPX vs. QCGDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMOPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the QCGDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMOPX and QCGDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LMOPX	QCGDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	0.54	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02	0.48	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.57	-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between LMOPX and QCGDX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

LMOPX vs. QCGDX - Dividend Comparison

LMOPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
LMOPX Miller Opportunity Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	14.45%	1.28%	0.00%
QCGDX Quantified Common Ground Fund	0.67%	0.69%	4.42%	0.22%	0.00%	5.44%	1.65%

Drawdowns

LMOPX vs. QCGDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMOPX drawdown since its inception was -81.54%, which is greater than QCGDX's maximum drawdown of -22.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMOPX and QCGDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LMOPX	QCGDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.54%	-22.37%	-59.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.06%	-8.85%	-8.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.85%	-20.18%	-32.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.96%	-4.69%	-11.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.29%	-6.27%	-15.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.11%	2.25%	+2.86%

Volatility

LMOPX vs. QCGDX - Volatility Comparison

Miller Opportunity Trust (LMOPX) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX) at 4.92%. This indicates that LMOPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCGDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LMOPX	QCGDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.20%	4.92%	+2.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.63%	9.53%	+6.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.14%	13.53%	+14.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.13%	14.77%	+13.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.89%	16.53%	+12.36%