PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMOPX vs. ATGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMOPX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Miller Opportunity Trust (LMOPX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


LMOPX

1D
-2.19%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
5.67%
6M
7.46%
1Y
39.88%
3Y*
25.89%
5Y*
3.02%
10Y*
12.58%

ATGAX

1D
1.15%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMOPX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LMOPX and ATGAX is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

-1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMOPX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMOPX
LMOPX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LMOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
LMOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

ATGAX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMOPX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Miller Opportunity Trust (LMOPX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMOPXATGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.24

LMOPX vs. ATGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMOPXATGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

58.33

-58.07

Drawdowns

LMOPX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMOPX drawdown since its inception was -81.54%, which is greater than ATGAX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMOPX and ATGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMOPXATGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.54%

0.00%

-81.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.72%

0.00%

-2.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.17%

0.00%

-21.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.51%

Volatility

LMOPX vs. ATGAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMOPXATGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.02%

9.26%

+11.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.12%

9.26%

+18.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.86%

9.26%

+19.60%

LMOPX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMOPX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMOPX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison

Neither LMOPX nor ATGAX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ATGAX
Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LMOPX
Miller Opportunity Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.45%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMOPX and ATGAX have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMOPX and ATGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer