PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMISX vs. LMASX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMISX vs. LMASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund (LMISX) and ClearBridge Small Cap Fund (LMASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMISX achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly lower than LMASX's 12.89% return. Over the past 10 years, LMISX has outperformed LMASX with an annualized return of 15.60%, while LMASX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.10% annualized return.


LMISX

1D
-0.24%
1M
1.45%
YTD
9.85%
6M
8.55%
1Y
28.37%
3Y*
23.89%
5Y*
13.93%
10Y*
15.60%

LMASX

1D
0.21%
1M
3.86%
YTD
12.89%
6M
9.94%
1Y
26.75%
3Y*
11.05%
5Y*
2.58%
10Y*
8.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMISX vs. LMASX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMISX
Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund
9.85%18.05%29.58%27.88%-20.61%31.69%17.20%25.95%-7.57%23.50%
LMASX
ClearBridge Small Cap Fund
12.89%5.38%6.61%16.09%-21.19%17.67%2.44%29.75%-9.81%10.94%

Correlation

The correlation between LMISX and LMASX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2008

0.85

The correlation between LMISX and LMASX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMISX vs. LMASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMISX
LMISX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
LMISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMISX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
LMISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMISX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

LMASX
LMASX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
LMASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMASX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
LMASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMASX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMISX vs. LMASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund (LMISX) and ClearBridge Small Cap Fund (LMASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LMISXLMASXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.28

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

2.80

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.48

8.88

+6.59

LMISX vs. LMASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMISX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the LMASX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMISX and LMASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LMISX vs. LMASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMISX drawdown since its inception was -50.34%, smaller than the maximum LMASX drawdown of -69.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMISX and LMASX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMISXLMASXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.34%

-69.22%

+18.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.69%

-10.05%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.22%

-26.38%

+6.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.11%

-30.07%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

-47.13%

+11.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-0.13%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.59%

-10.44%

+2.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

3.16%

-1.25%

Volatility

LMISX vs. LMASX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund (LMISX) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to ClearBridge Small Cap Fund (LMASX) at 4.20%. This indicates that LMISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMISXLMASXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

4.20%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.84%

11.84%

-2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.57%

17.31%

-4.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.75%

20.99%

-3.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.83%

22.58%

-3.75%

LMISX vs. LMASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMISX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than LMASX's 1.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMISX vs. LMASX - Dividend Comparison

LMISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%, less than LMASX's 10.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMASX
ClearBridge Small Cap Fund
10.50%11.86%6.98%1.81%0.00%18.14%0.05%4.15%13.81%6.78%3.35%5.67%
LMISX
Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund
5.36%4.11%3.97%7.68%0.95%25.55%3.53%8.42%17.16%6.53%1.42%6.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMISX and LMASX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMISX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to LMASX (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMISX dropped -50.34% vs LMASX's -69.22%.

LMISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMISX and LMASX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer