PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMISX vs. ARMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMISX vs. ARMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund (LMISX) and Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund (ARMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMISX achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly higher than ARMGX's 1.07% return. Over the past 10 years, LMISX has outperformed ARMGX with an annualized return of 15.33%, while ARMGX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.22% annualized return.


LMISX

1D
0.92%
1M
1.69%
YTD
10.11%
6M
9.16%
1Y
29.79%
3Y*
23.50%
5Y*
14.42%
10Y*
15.33%

ARMGX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.07%
6M
1.35%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
4.34%
5Y*
2.66%
10Y*
2.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMISX vs. ARMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMISX
Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund
10.11%18.05%29.58%27.88%-20.61%31.69%17.20%25.95%-7.57%23.50%
ARMGX
Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund
1.07%4.20%4.67%5.25%-1.91%0.06%0.80%3.38%0.91%3.09%

Correlation

The correlation between LMISX and ARMGX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2008

0.08

The correlation between LMISX and ARMGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMISX vs. ARMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMISX
LMISX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LMISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMISX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
LMISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMISX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

ARMGX
ARMGX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ARMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ARMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMISX vs. ARMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund (LMISX) and Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund (ARMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LMISXARMGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

2.48

-1.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

11.07

-7.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.51

49.49

-33.98

LMISX vs. ARMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMISX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the ARMGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMISX and ARMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LMISX vs. ARMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMISX drawdown since its inception was -50.34%, which is greater than ARMGX's maximum drawdown of -21.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMISX and ARMGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMISXARMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.34%

-21.79%

-28.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.69%

-0.33%

-8.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.22%

-0.55%

-19.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.11%

-3.23%

-22.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

-9.09%

-26.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-0.11%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.60%

-1.53%

-6.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

0.07%

+1.84%

Volatility

LMISX vs. ARMGX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund (LMISX) has a higher volatility of 4.91% compared to Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund (ARMGX) at 0.39%. This indicates that LMISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMISXARMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

0.39%

+4.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.89%

0.88%

+9.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.55%

1.19%

+11.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.76%

1.26%

+16.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.82%

1.62%

+17.20%

LMISX vs. ARMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMISX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMGX's 1.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMISX vs. ARMGX - Dividend Comparison

LMISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, more than ARMGX's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARMGX
Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund
2.87%3.00%2.43%2.23%1.37%0.17%1.45%2.32%1.92%1.37%0.96%0.48%
LMISX
Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund
5.35%4.11%3.97%7.68%0.95%25.55%3.53%8.42%17.16%6.53%1.42%6.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMISX and ARMGX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMISX has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to ARMGX (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMISX dropped -50.34% vs ARMGX's -21.79%.

ARMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMISX and ARMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer