LMGTX vs. LMASX
LMGTX (ClearBridge International Growth Fund) and LMASX (ClearBridge Small Cap Fund) are both mutual funds - LMGTX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Legg Mason, while LMASX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Legg Mason. Over the past 10 years, LMGTX returned 9.60%/yr vs 7.85%/yr for LMASX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LMGTX charges 1.80%/yr vs 1.85%/yr for LMASX.
Performance
LMGTX vs. LMASX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMGTX achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than LMASX's 12.65% return. Over the past 10 years, LMGTX has outperformed LMASX with an annualized return of 9.60%, while LMASX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.85% annualized return.
LMGTX
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- 5.08%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 6M
- 8.35%
- 1Y
- 18.09%
- 3Y*
- 12.06%
- 5Y*
- 4.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.60%
LMASX
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 12.65%
- 6M
- 9.09%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 9.92%
- 5Y*
- 3.07%
- 10Y*
- 7.85%
LMGTX vs. LMASX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMGTX ClearBridge International Growth Fund | 8.45% | 21.83% | 6.39% | 13.17% | -21.97% | 2.93% | 23.55% | 30.01% | -10.28% | 35.09% |
LMASX ClearBridge Small Cap Fund | 12.65% | 5.38% | 6.61% | 16.09% | -21.19% | 17.67% | 2.44% | 29.75% | -9.81% | 10.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMGTX and LMASX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 1995 | 0.77 |
The correlation between LMGTX and LMASX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMGTX vs. LMASX — Risk / Return Rank
LMGTX
LMASX
LMGTX vs. LMASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge International Growth Fund (LMGTX) and ClearBridge Small Cap Fund (LMASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LMGTX | LMASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.28 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 2.77 | -1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.48 | 8.77 | -4.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LMGTX vs. LMASX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMGTX drawdown since its inception was -71.47%, roughly equal to the maximum LMASX drawdown of -69.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMGTX and LMASX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMGTX | LMASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.47% | -69.22% | -2.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.71% | -10.05% | -3.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.53% | -26.38% | +11.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.65% | -30.07% | -5.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.65% | -47.13% | +11.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.35% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.47% | -10.44% | -6.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 3.16% | +0.66% |
Volatility
LMGTX vs. LMASX - Volatility Comparison
ClearBridge International Growth Fund (LMGTX) has a higher volatility of 7.59% compared to ClearBridge Small Cap Fund (LMASX) at 4.67%. This indicates that LMGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMGTX | LMASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.59% | 4.67% | +2.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.23% | 11.85% | +4.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.78% | 17.28% | +1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 21.01% | -3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 22.57% | -5.11% |
LMGTX vs. LMASX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMGTX has a 1.80% expense ratio, which is lower than LMASX's 1.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
LMGTX vs. LMASX - Dividend Comparison
LMGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.20%, less than LMASX's 10.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMASX ClearBridge Small Cap Fund | 10.53% | 11.86% | 6.98% | 1.81% | 0.00% | 18.14% | 0.05% | 4.15% | 13.81% | 6.78% | 3.35% | 5.67% |
LMGTX ClearBridge International Growth Fund | 7.20% | 7.81% | 0.54% | 0.48% | 0.07% | 2.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LMGTX and LMASX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LMGTX has higher volatility (7.59%) compared to LMASX (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMGTX dropped -71.47% vs LMASX's -69.22%.
LMASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LMGTX and LMASX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer