LMGTX vs. LMASX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LMGTX (ClearBridge International Growth Fund) and LMASX (ClearBridge Small Cap Fund) are both mutual funds - LMGTX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Legg Mason, while LMASX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Legg Mason. Over the past 10 years, LMGTX returned 8.48%/yr vs 7.61%/yr for LMASX. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LMGTX charges 1.80%/yr vs 1.85%/yr for LMASX.

Performance

LMGTX vs. LMASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge International Growth Fund (LMGTX) and ClearBridge Small Cap Fund (LMASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMGTX achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly lower than LMASX's 15.34% return. Over the past 10 years, LMGTX has outperformed LMASX with an annualized return of 8.48%, while LMASX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.61% annualized return.

LMGTX

• 1D: 3.94%
• 1M: -3.00%
• 6M: -1.70%
• YTD: 1.25%
• 1Y: 9.97%
• 3Y*: 9.47%
• 5Y*: 2.94%
• 10Y*: 8.48%
• ALL TIME*: 6.99%

LMASX

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -0.29%
• 6M: 11.27%
• YTD: 15.34%
• 1Y: 26.57%
• 3Y*: 8.92%
• 5Y*: 3.92%
• 10Y*: 7.61%
• ALL TIME*: 9.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LMASX ClearBridge Small Cap Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
LMGTX ClearBridge International Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

LMGTX vs. LMASX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LMGTX ClearBridge International Growth Fund	1.25%	21.83%	6.39%	13.17%	-21.97%	2.93%	23.55%	30.01%	-10.28%	35.09%
LMASX ClearBridge Small Cap Fund	15.34%	5.38%	6.61%	16.09%	-21.19%	17.67%	2.44%	29.75%	-9.81%	10.94%

Correlation

The correlation between LMGTX and LMASX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 1995	0.77

The correlation between LMGTX and LMASX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LMGTX vs. LMASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LMGTX

LMGTX Risk / Return Rank: 11
LMGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
LMGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
LMGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
LMGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
LMGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

LMASX

LMASX Risk / Return Rank: 53
LMASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
LMASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
LMASX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
LMASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
LMASX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LMGTX vs. LMASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge International Growth Fund (LMGTX) and ClearBridge Small Cap Fund (LMASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LMGTX	LMASX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	1.37	-0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.70	2.07	-1.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.24	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.58	2.29	-1.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.88	7.39	-5.52

LMGTX vs. LMASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMGTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the LMASX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMGTX and LMASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LMGTX vs. LMASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMGTX drawdown since its inception was -71.47%, roughly equal to the maximum LMASX drawdown of -69.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMGTX and LMASX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LMGTX	LMASX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.47%	-69.22%	-2.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.71%	-10.05%	-3.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.53%	-26.38%	+11.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.65%	-30.07%	-5.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.65%	-47.13%	+11.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.70%	-1.06%	-5.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.43%	-10.42%	-6.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.22%	3.12%	+1.10%

Volatility

LMGTX vs. LMASX - Volatility Comparison

ClearBridge International Growth Fund (LMGTX) has a higher volatility of 6.93% compared to ClearBridge Small Cap Fund (LMASX) at 3.46%. This indicates that LMGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LMGTX	LMASX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.93%	3.46%	+3.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.67%	11.59%	+6.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.06%	16.89%	+3.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.23%	20.89%	-2.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.35%	22.50%	-5.15%

LMGTX vs. LMASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMGTX has a 1.80% expense ratio, which is lower than LMASX's 1.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

LMGTX vs. LMASX - Dividend Comparison

LMGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.72%, less than LMASX's 10.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LMASX ClearBridge Small Cap Fund	10.28%	11.86%	6.98%	1.81%	0.00%	18.14%	0.05%	4.15%	13.81%	6.78%	3.35%	5.67%
LMGTX ClearBridge International Growth Fund	7.72%	7.81%	0.54%	0.48%	0.07%	2.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LMGTX and LMASX in my portfolio?

LMGTX and LMASX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LMGTX or LMASX?

LMGTX has higher volatility (6.93%) compared to LMASX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMGTX dropped -71.47% vs LMASX's -69.22%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LMASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.