LMGTX vs. LCSSX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LMGTX (ClearBridge International Growth Fund) and LCSSX (ClearBridge Select Fund) are both mutual funds - LMGTX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Legg Mason, while LCSSX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Legg Mason. Over the past 10 years, LMGTX returned 9.60%/yr vs 16.95%/yr for LCSSX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LMGTX charges 1.80%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for LCSSX.

Performance

LMGTX vs. LCSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge International Growth Fund (LMGTX) and ClearBridge Select Fund (LCSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMGTX achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly higher than LCSSX's 3.46% return. Over the past 10 years, LMGTX has underperformed LCSSX with an annualized return of 9.60%, while LCSSX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.95% annualized return.

LMGTX

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: 5.08%
• YTD: 8.45%
• 6M: 8.35%
• 1Y: 18.09%
• 3Y*: 12.06%
• 5Y*: 4.56%
• 10Y*: 9.60%

LCSSX

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 2.24%
• YTD: 3.46%
• 6M: 1.96%
• 1Y: 13.34%
• 3Y*: 13.44%
• 5Y*: 3.32%
• 10Y*: 16.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMGTX vs. LCSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LMGTX ClearBridge International Growth Fund	8.45%	21.83%	6.39%	13.17%	-21.97%	2.93%	23.55%	30.01%	-10.28%	35.09%
LCSSX ClearBridge Select Fund	3.46%	7.26%	21.54%	24.25%	-33.06%	20.27%	58.86%	33.60%	10.56%	39.04%

Correlation

The correlation between LMGTX and LCSSX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2012	0.78

The correlation between LMGTX and LCSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LMGTX vs. LCSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMGTX

LMGTX Risk / Return Rank: 14
LMGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
LMGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
LMGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
LMGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
LMGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

LCSSX

LCSSX Risk / Return Rank: 11
LCSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
LCSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
LCSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
LCSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
LCSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMGTX vs. LCSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge International Growth Fund (LMGTX) and ClearBridge Select Fund (LCSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LMGTX	LCSSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	0.87	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.38	1.27	+0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.15	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.25	0.93	+0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.48	2.85	+1.63

LMGTX vs. LCSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMGTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the LCSSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMGTX and LCSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LMGTX vs. LCSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMGTX drawdown since its inception was -71.47%, which is greater than LCSSX's maximum drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMGTX and LCSSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LMGTX	LCSSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.47%	-43.46%	-28.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.71%	-14.24%	+0.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.53%	-23.67%	+9.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.65%	-43.46%	+7.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.65%	-43.46%	+7.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.11%	+2.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.47%	-9.17%	-7.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.82%	4.63%	-0.81%

Volatility

LMGTX vs. LCSSX - Volatility Comparison

ClearBridge International Growth Fund (LMGTX) has a higher volatility of 7.59% compared to ClearBridge Select Fund (LCSSX) at 5.13%. This indicates that LMGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LMGTX	LCSSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.59%	5.13%	+2.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.23%	11.95%	+4.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.78%	15.14%	+3.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.98%	21.82%	-3.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.46%	21.94%	-4.48%

LMGTX vs. LCSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMGTX has a 1.80% expense ratio, which is higher than LCSSX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

LMGTX vs. LCSSX - Dividend Comparison

LMGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.20%, while LCSSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LCSSX ClearBridge Select Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	3.26%	0.00%	0.00%	1.28%	2.11%	1.12%	5.25%
LMGTX ClearBridge International Growth Fund	7.20%	7.81%	0.54%	0.48%	0.07%	2.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LMGTX and LCSSX in my portfolio?

LMGTX and LCSSX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LMGTX or LCSSX?

LMGTX has higher volatility (7.59%) compared to LCSSX (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMGTX dropped -71.47% vs LCSSX's -43.46%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LMGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.