LMASX vs. PRSVX
Compare and contrast key facts about ClearBridge Small Cap Fund (LMASX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX).
LMASX is managed by Legg Mason. It was launched on Dec 30, 1985. PRSVX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 30, 1988.
Performance
LMASX vs. PRSVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LMASX vs. PRSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMASX ClearBridge Small Cap Fund | 0.79% | 5.38% | 6.61% | 16.09% | -21.19% | 17.67% | 2.44% | 29.75% | -9.81% | 10.94% |
PRSVX T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund | 3.77% | 21.18% | 10.84% | 12.34% | -18.53% | 25.47% | 12.49% | 25.82% | -11.58% | 12.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMASX achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than PRSVX's 3.77% return. Over the past 10 years, LMASX has underperformed PRSVX with an annualized return of 7.35%, while PRSVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.92% annualized return.
LMASX
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -5.39%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 13.99%
- 3Y*
- 8.62%
- 5Y*
- 1.29%
- 10Y*
- 7.35%
PRSVX
- 1D
- 2.78%
- 1M
- -5.04%
- YTD
- 3.77%
- 6M
- 18.45%
- 1Y
- 33.24%
- 3Y*
- 16.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LMASX vs. PRSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMASX has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PRSVX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LMASX vs. PRSVX — Risk / Return Rank
LMASX
PRSVX
LMASX vs. PRSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Small Cap Fund (LMASX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LMASX | PRSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 1.44 | -0.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.01 | 2.26 | -1.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.31 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 2.08 | -1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.92 | 8.63 | -4.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMASX | PRSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 1.44 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.34 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.52 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.64 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between LMASX and PRSVX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LMASX vs. PRSVX - Dividend Comparison
LMASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.77%, less than PRSVX's 21.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMASX ClearBridge Small Cap Fund | 11.77% | 11.86% | 6.98% | 1.81% | 0.00% | 18.14% | 0.05% | 4.15% | 13.81% | 6.78% | 3.35% | 5.67% |
PRSVX T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund | 21.96% | 22.79% | 9.77% | 3.27% | 5.28% | 6.98% | 2.03% | 4.59% | 9.46% | 3.79% | 3.77% | 22.55% |
Drawdowns
LMASX vs. PRSVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMASX drawdown since its inception was -69.22%, which is greater than PRSVX's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMASX and PRSVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMASX | PRSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.22% | -55.37% | -13.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.72% | -14.04% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.07% | -28.17% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.13% | -40.97% | -6.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.79% | -5.61% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.49% | -7.52% | -2.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 3.68% | +0.33% |
Volatility
LMASX vs. PRSVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ClearBridge Small Cap Fund (LMASX) is 6.17%, while T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that LMASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LMASX | PRSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.17% | 6.72% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.02% | 16.12% | -3.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.26% | 23.88% | -1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 20.42% | +0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 21.28% | +1.27% |