LLYH.TO vs. PLTE.TO
LLYH.TO (Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units) and PLTE.TO (Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LLYH.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by Harvest, while PLTE.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LLYH.TO returned 39.69% vs 10.84% for PLTE.TO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
LLYH.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LLYH.TO achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly higher than PLTE.TO's -21.07% return.
LLYH.TO
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 11.47%
- YTD
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- 39.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTE.TO
- 1D
- -6.14%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- -21.07%
- 6M
- -20.59%
- 1Y
- 10.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LLYH.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LLYH.TO Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 3.76% | 25.36% |
PLTE.TO Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | -21.07% | 159.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between LLYH.TO and PLTE.TO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2025 | 0.11 |
The correlation between LLYH.TO and PLTE.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LLYH.TO vs. PLTE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
LLYH.TO
PLTE.TO
LLYH.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (LLYH.TO) and Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LLYH.TO | PLTE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.08 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 0.26 | +1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.21 | 0.50 | +4.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LLYH.TO | PLTE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 0.19 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.99 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
LLYH.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LLYH.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.00%, smaller than the maximum PLTE.TO drawdown of -43.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLYH.TO and PLTE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LLYH.TO | PLTE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.00% | -43.92% | +12.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.97% | -41.32% | +20.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -31.82% | +29.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.18% | -17.25% | +7.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.64% | 21.78% | -14.14% |
Volatility
LLYH.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (LLYH.TO) is 6.85%, while Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO) has a volatility of 18.90%. This indicates that LLYH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LLYH.TO | PLTE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.85% | 18.90% | -12.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.78% | 42.12% | -17.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.04% | 56.11% | -23.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.82% | 69.55% | -35.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.82% | 69.55% | -35.73% |
LLYH.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LLYH.TO and PLTE.TO have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
LLYH.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Dividend Comparison
LLYH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.81%, less than PLTE.TO's 40.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LLYH.TO Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 17.81% | 17.54% | 6.17% |
PLTE.TO Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 40.53% | 23.70% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LLYH.TO and PLTE.TO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LLYH.TO and PLTE.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
LLYH.TO is categorized as Dividend, while PLTE.TO is Derivative Income.
Find the right allocation for LLYH.TO and PLTE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer