LLYH.TO vs. HHIC.TO
LLYH.TO (Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units) and HHIC.TO (Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LLYH.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by Harvest, while HHIC.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by Harvest. Both are actively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
LLYH.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LLYH.TO achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly lower than HHIC.TO's 13.62% return.
LLYH.TO
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 11.47%
- YTD
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- 39.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HHIC.TO
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 13.62%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LLYH.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LLYH.TO Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 3.76% | 37.39% |
HHIC.TO Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF | 13.62% | 16.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between LLYH.TO and HHIC.TO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LLYH.TO vs. HHIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
LLYH.TO
HHIC.TO
LLYH.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (LLYH.TO) and Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF (HHIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LLYH.TO | HHIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.21 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LLYH.TO | HHIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 2.57 | -2.33 |
Drawdowns
LLYH.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LLYH.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.00%, which is greater than HHIC.TO's maximum drawdown of -7.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLYH.TO and HHIC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LLYH.TO | HHIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.00% | -7.26% | -23.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -0.83% | -1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.18% | -1.47% | -8.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.64% | — | — |
Volatility
LLYH.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LLYH.TO | HHIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.85% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.78% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.04% | 16.67% | +16.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.82% | 16.67% | +17.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.82% | 16.67% | +17.15% |
LLYH.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LLYH.TO and HHIC.TO have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
LLYH.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Dividend Comparison
LLYH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.81%, more than HHIC.TO's 10.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HHIC.TO Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF | 10.90% | 4.77% | 0.00% |
LLYH.TO Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 17.81% | 17.54% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LLYH.TO and HHIC.TO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LLYH.TO and HHIC.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
LLYH.TO is categorized as Dividend, while HHIC.TO is Canada Equities.
Find the right allocation for LLYH.TO and HHIC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer