LLYH.TO vs. HBIX.NEO
LLYH.TO (Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units) and HBIX.NEO (Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LLYH.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by Harvest, while HBIX.NEO is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Harvest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LLYH.TO returned 39.69% vs -41.89% for HBIX.NEO. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LLYH.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for HBIX.NEO.
Performance
LLYH.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LLYH.TO achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly higher than HBIX.NEO's -28.85% return.
LLYH.TO
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 11.47%
- YTD
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- 39.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBIX.NEO
- 1D
- -3.26%
- 1M
- -19.49%
- YTD
- -28.85%
- 6M
- -33.69%
- 1Y
- -41.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LLYH.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LLYH.TO Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 3.76% | 14.67% |
HBIX.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF | -28.85% | -6.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between LLYH.TO and HBIX.NEO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LLYH.TO vs. HBIX.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
LLYH.TO
HBIX.NEO
LLYH.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (LLYH.TO) and Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LLYH.TO | HBIX.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.87 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | -0.75 | +2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.21 | -1.33 | +6.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LLYH.TO | HBIX.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | -0.81 | +2.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | -0.62 | +0.86 |
Drawdowns
LLYH.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LLYH.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.00%, smaller than the maximum HBIX.NEO drawdown of -55.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLYH.TO and HBIX.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LLYH.TO | HBIX.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.00% | -55.90% | +24.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.97% | -55.90% | +34.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -52.88% | +50.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.18% | -23.75% | +13.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.64% | 31.57% | -23.93% |
Volatility
LLYH.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (LLYH.TO) is 6.85%, while Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) has a volatility of 11.40%. This indicates that LLYH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBIX.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LLYH.TO | HBIX.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.85% | 11.40% | -4.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.78% | 41.52% | -16.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.04% | 51.62% | -18.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.82% | 50.94% | -17.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.82% | 50.94% | -17.12% |
LLYH.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
LLYH.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HBIX.NEO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
LLYH.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Dividend Comparison
LLYH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.81%, less than HBIX.NEO's 44.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HBIX.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF | 44.52% | 20.21% | 0.00% |
LLYH.TO Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 17.81% | 17.54% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LLYH.TO and HBIX.NEO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LLYH.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LLYH.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for HBIX.NEO.
LLYH.TO is categorized as Dividend, while HBIX.NEO is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LLYH.TO and 0.65% for HBIX.NEO.
Find the right allocation for LLYH.TO and HBIX.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer