LLSCX vs. FMDCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) and Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund (FMDCX).
LLSCX is managed by Longleaf Partners. It was launched on Feb 21, 1989. FMDCX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Nov 5, 1992.
Performance
LLSCX vs. FMDCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LLSCX vs. FMDCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LLSCX Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund | -3.68% | 7.56% | 9.69% | 20.17% | -19.25% | 11.18% | 4.17% | 27.74% | -6.52% | 9.07% |
FMDCX Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund | -0.39% | 6.95% | 13.34% | 16.38% | -13.88% | 25.28% | 13.37% | 25.36% | -11.51% | 15.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LLSCX achieves a -3.68% return, which is significantly lower than FMDCX's -0.39% return. Over the past 10 years, LLSCX has underperformed FMDCX with an annualized return of 6.69%, while FMDCX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.78% annualized return.
LLSCX
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- YTD
- -3.68%
- 6M
- -2.59%
- 1Y
- 2.07%
- 3Y*
- 9.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.87%
- 10Y*
- 6.69%
FMDCX
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- -8.75%
- YTD
- -0.39%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 13.54%
- 3Y*
- 10.62%
- 5Y*
- 5.98%
- 10Y*
- 9.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LLSCX vs. FMDCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LLSCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDCX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LLSCX vs. FMDCX — Risk / Return Rank
LLSCX
FMDCX
LLSCX vs. FMDCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) and Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund (FMDCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LLSCX | FMDCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.15 | 0.64 | -0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.32 | 1.09 | -0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.15 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.30 | 0.34 | -0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LLSCX | FMDCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | 0.64 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.31 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.47 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.52 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between LLSCX and FMDCX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LLSCX vs. FMDCX - Dividend Comparison
LLSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than FMDCX's 10.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LLSCX Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund | 1.22% | 1.17% | 0.11% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 0.82% | 5.85% | 14.89% | 18.13% | 8.43% | 18.01% | 5.91% |
FMDCX Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund | 10.71% | 10.67% | 15.63% | 11.46% | 12.33% | 22.20% | 15.60% | 10.60% | 26.14% | 17.30% | 11.41% | 14.68% |
Drawdowns
LLSCX vs. FMDCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LLSCX drawdown since its inception was -63.97%, which is greater than FMDCX's maximum drawdown of -55.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLSCX and FMDCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LLSCX | FMDCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.97% | -55.36% | -8.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.47% | -14.10% | +3.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.37% | -24.16% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.23% | -42.05% | -0.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.92% | -8.75% | +0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.90% | -6.83% | -2.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 6.74% | -3.06% |
Volatility
LLSCX vs. FMDCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) is 3.90%, while Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund (FMDCX) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that LLSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMDCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LLSCX | FMDCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 4.62% | -0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.23% | 11.97% | -2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.42% | 24.20% | -8.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 20.29% | -3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.58% | 21.32% | +3.26% |