PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMDCX vs. BEARX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMDCX vs. BEARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund (FMDCX) and Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMDCX achieves a 14.67% return, which is significantly higher than BEARX's -6.07% return. Over the past 10 years, FMDCX has outperformed BEARX with an annualized return of 10.55%, while BEARX has yielded a comparatively lower -14.19% annualized return.


FMDCX

1D
0.83%
1M
-0.93%
6M
9.26%
YTD
14.67%
1Y
20.59%
3Y*
12.62%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
10.55%
ALL TIME*
10.98%

BEARX

1D
-1.66%
1M
0.85%
6M
-5.07%
YTD
-6.07%
1Y
-11.20%
3Y*
-13.79%
5Y*
-11.02%
10Y*
-14.19%
ALL TIME*
-2.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FMDCX vs. BEARX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMDCX
Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund
14.67%6.95%13.34%16.38%-13.88%25.28%13.37%25.36%-11.51%15.43%
BEARX
Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd
-6.07%-12.42%-20.34%-18.67%17.78%-23.78%-22.95%-19.95%-5.96%-15.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FMDCX and BEARX is -0.44, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 1995

-0.81

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between FMDCX and BEARX has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.81 to -0.44, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMDCX vs. BEARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FMDCX
FMDCX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FMDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FMDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

BEARX
BEARX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
BEARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEARX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
BEARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEARX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FMDCX vs. BEARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund (FMDCX) and Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMDCXBEARXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.86

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

-0.64

+3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.97

-1.23

+11.21

FMDCX vs. BEARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMDCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the BEARX Sharpe Ratio of -0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMDCX and BEARX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMDCX vs. BEARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMDCX drawdown since its inception was -55.36%, smaller than the maximum BEARX drawdown of -95.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMDCX and BEARX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMDCXBEARXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.36%

-95.75%

+40.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-16.55%

+7.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.16%

-44.46%

+20.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.16%

-52.48%

+28.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

-79.22%

+37.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

-95.59%

+93.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-61.21%

+54.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

8.60%

-6.32%

Volatility

FMDCX vs. BEARX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund (FMDCX) is 3.46%, while Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that FMDCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMDCXBEARXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

3.78%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.57%

10.32%

+1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.25%

12.86%

+3.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.29%

17.15%

+3.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.33%

16.71%

+4.62%

FMDCX vs. BEARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMDCX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than BEARX's 1.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMDCX vs. BEARX - Dividend Comparison

FMDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.28%, more than BEARX's 7.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BEARX
Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd
7.15%6.71%0.00%13.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FMDCX
Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund
9.28%10.67%15.63%11.46%12.33%22.20%15.60%10.60%26.14%17.30%11.41%14.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMDCX and BEARX have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BEARX has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to FMDCX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMDCX dropped -55.36% vs BEARX's -95.75%.

FMDCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMDCX and BEARX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer