PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMDCX vs. FNILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMDCX vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund (FMDCX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMDCX achieves a 15.81% return, which is significantly higher than FNILX's 9.63% return.


FMDCX

1D
0.41%
1M
3.75%
YTD
15.81%
6M
13.76%
1Y
25.82%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
8.62%
10Y*
11.38%

FNILX

1D
-0.37%
1M
0.34%
YTD
9.63%
6M
8.65%
1Y
25.14%
3Y*
21.66%
5Y*
13.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMDCX vs. FNILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FMDCX
Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund
15.81%6.95%13.34%16.38%-13.88%25.28%13.37%25.36%-17.23%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
9.63%17.81%25.47%27.45%-19.37%26.67%21.13%31.79%-13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FMDCX and FNILX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2018

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between FMDCX and FNILX has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMDCX vs. FNILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMDCX
FMDCX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FMDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FMDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FNILX
FNILX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FNILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNILX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FNILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNILX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMDCX vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund (FMDCX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMDCXFNILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.38

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

2.94

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.22

12.99

+1.23

FMDCX vs. FNILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMDCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the FNILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMDCX and FNILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMDCX vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMDCX drawdown since its inception was -55.36%, which is greater than FNILX's maximum drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMDCX and FNILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMDCXFNILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.36%

-33.76%

-21.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-9.01%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.16%

-19.08%

-5.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.16%

-25.40%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.73%

+1.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-5.35%

-1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.03%

+0.29%

Volatility

FMDCX vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund (FMDCX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) have volatilities of 4.58% and 4.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMDCXFNILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

4.82%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.52%

9.90%

+2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.48%

12.61%

+3.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.37%

17.34%

+3.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.41%

20.04%

+1.37%

FMDCX vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMDCX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMDCX vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison

FMDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.19%, more than FNILX's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMDCX
Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund
9.19%10.67%15.63%11.46%12.33%22.20%15.60%10.60%26.14%17.30%11.41%14.68%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
0.92%1.01%1.09%1.34%1.53%0.95%1.20%1.17%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMDCX and FNILX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNILX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to FMDCX (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMDCX dropped -55.36% vs FNILX's -33.76%.

FNILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMDCX and FNILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer