PortfoliosLab logo
LLSCX vs. VSIAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LLSCX and VSIAX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

LLSCX vs. VSIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LLSCX:

0.45

VSIAX:

0.19

Sortino Ratio

LLSCX:

0.72

VSIAX:

0.42

Omega Ratio

LLSCX:

1.09

VSIAX:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

LLSCX:

0.45

VSIAX:

0.17

Martin Ratio

LLSCX:

1.26

VSIAX:

0.49

Ulcer Index

LLSCX:

5.52%

VSIAX:

8.19%

Daily Std Dev

LLSCX:

16.12%

VSIAX:

21.86%

Max Drawdown

LLSCX:

-63.97%

VSIAX:

-45.39%

Current Drawdown

LLSCX:

-5.44%

VSIAX:

-11.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLSCX achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly higher than VSIAX's -4.04% return. Over the past 10 years, LLSCX has underperformed VSIAX with an annualized return of 5.25%, while VSIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.81% annualized return.


LLSCX

YTD

2.74%

1M

4.85%

6M

-5.28%

1Y

5.56%

3Y*

4.99%

5Y*

12.66%

10Y*

5.25%

VSIAX

YTD

-4.04%

1M

4.76%

6M

-11.42%

1Y

2.77%

3Y*

6.38%

5Y*

14.82%

10Y*

7.81%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LLSCX vs. VSIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LLSCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VSIAX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LLSCX vs. VSIAX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLSCX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LLSCX is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LLSCX is 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LLSCX is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LLSCX is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LLSCX is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LLSCX is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

VSIAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VSIAX is 2020
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VSIAX is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VSIAX is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VSIAX is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VSIAX is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VSIAX is 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LLSCX vs. VSIAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LLSCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is higher than the VSIAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LLSCX and VSIAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

LLSCX vs. VSIAX - Dividend Comparison

LLSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than VSIAX's 2.23% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LLSCX
Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund
0.11%0.11%0.94%1.20%0.82%9.30%8.71%18.12%8.43%18.01%5.91%19.79%
VSIAX
Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares
2.23%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%1.77%

Drawdowns

LLSCX vs. VSIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLSCX drawdown since its inception was -63.97%, which is greater than VSIAX's maximum drawdown of -45.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLSCX and VSIAX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

LLSCX vs. VSIAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) is 4.76%, while Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSIAX) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that LLSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VSIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...