PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LLSCX vs. FNKFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LLSCX vs. FNKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K6 Fund (FNKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LLSCX vs. FNKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LLSCX
Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund
-3.68%7.56%9.69%20.17%-19.25%11.18%4.17%18.67%
FNKFX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K6 Fund
1.09%11.07%21.99%11.55%-5.98%27.16%11.27%8.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLSCX achieves a -3.68% return, which is significantly lower than FNKFX's 1.09% return.


LLSCX

1D
0.61%
1M
-3.81%
YTD
-3.68%
6M
-2.59%
1Y
2.07%
3Y*
9.42%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
6.69%

FNKFX

1D
-1.40%
1M
-7.76%
YTD
1.09%
6M
3.47%
1Y
19.33%
3Y*
14.58%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LLSCX vs. FNKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LLSCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FNKFX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LLSCX vs. FNKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLSCX
LLSCX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
LLSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
LLSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

FNKFX
FNKFX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FNKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FNKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLSCX vs. FNKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K6 Fund (FNKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LLSCXFNKFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.15

0.98

-0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.32

1.47

-1.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.20

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

1.24

-1.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.30

5.64

-5.34

LLSCX vs. FNKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LLSCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the FNKFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LLSCX and FNKFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LLSCXFNKFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

0.98

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.53

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.57

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between LLSCX and FNKFX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

LLSCX vs. FNKFX - Dividend Comparison

LLSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than FNKFX's 0.58% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LLSCX
Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund
1.22%1.17%0.11%0.94%1.20%0.82%5.85%14.89%18.13%8.43%18.01%5.91%
FNKFX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K6 Fund
0.58%0.59%12.35%0.99%2.91%4.03%1.45%0.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LLSCX vs. FNKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLSCX drawdown since its inception was -63.97%, which is greater than FNKFX's maximum drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLSCX and FNKFX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LLSCXFNKFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.97%

-41.25%

-22.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-13.51%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.37%

-21.86%

-6.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.92%

-8.67%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.90%

-5.07%

-3.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

2.98%

+0.70%

Volatility

LLSCX vs. FNKFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) is 3.90%, while Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K6 Fund (FNKFX) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that LLSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LLSCXFNKFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

6.61%

-2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.23%

12.09%

-2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.42%

20.24%

-4.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.00%

18.73%

-1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.58%

22.06%

+2.52%