LJUL vs. UGA
LJUL (Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - LJUL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. LJUL is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. Over the past year, LJUL returned 5.58% vs 79.48% for UGA. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. LJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
LJUL vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LJUL achieves a 1.89% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 70.69% return.
LJUL
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.89%
- 6M
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UGA
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -12.25%
- YTD
- 70.69%
- 6M
- 59.72%
- 1Y
- 79.48%
- 3Y*
- 20.80%
- 5Y*
- 24.41%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
LJUL vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LJUL Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July | 1.89% | 5.91% | 3.27% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 70.69% | -2.00% | -9.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between LJUL and UGA is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024 | -0.02 |
The correlation between LJUL and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LJUL vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
LJUL
UGA
LJUL vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LJUL | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.87 | 1.37 | +0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.68 | 5.37 | +5.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 53.88 | 12.86 | +41.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LJUL | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.53 | 2.27 | +1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.79 | 0.12 | +1.68 |
Drawdowns
LJUL vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LJUL drawdown since its inception was -3.21%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LJUL and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LJUL | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -86.59% | +83.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.52% | -14.88% | +14.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -14.75% | +14.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.12% | -36.76% | +36.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.10% | 6.20% | -6.10% |
Volatility
LJUL vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL) is 0.23%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that LJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LJUL | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.23% | 11.64% | -11.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.06% | 30.48% | -29.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58% | 35.27% | -33.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.25% | 34.40% | -31.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.25% | 37.27% | -34.02% |
LJUL vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
LJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LJUL vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
LJUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LJUL Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July | 5.22% | 5.36% | 2.78% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LJUL and UGA have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to LJUL (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LJUL dropped -3.21% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 1-year performance, UGA leads with 79.48% vs 5.58% for LJUL. On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, LJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UGA has performed better with a 79.48% return vs 5.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for LJUL.
LJUL has the higher dividend yield at 5.22%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
LJUL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for LJUL and 0.75% for UGA.
LJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LJUL and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer