PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LJUL vs. FFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LJUL vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LJUL vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LJUL
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July
0.83%5.91%3.27%
FFTY
Innovator IBD 50 ETF
-1.49%23.38%3.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LJUL achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly higher than FFTY's -1.49% return.


LJUL

1D
0.03%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.83%
6M
2.16%
1Y
6.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FFTY

1D
0.85%
1M
-12.66%
YTD
-1.49%
6M
-8.41%
1Y
31.77%
3Y*
14.09%
5Y*
-4.02%
10Y*
5.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LJUL vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

LJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LJUL vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LJUL
LJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
LJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
LJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
LJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
LJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FFTY
FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LJUL vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LJULFFTYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.42

0.81

+0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.29

1.21

+1.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.16

+0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

1.26

+0.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.27

3.62

+12.64

LJUL vs. FFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LJUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the FFTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LJUL and FFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LJULFFTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

0.81

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.70

0.13

+1.57

Correlation

The correlation between LJUL and FFTY is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

LJUL vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison

LJUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.29%, more than FFTY's 1.37% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LJUL
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July
5.29%5.36%2.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FFTY
Innovator IBD 50 ETF
1.37%1.35%0.91%0.65%2.75%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%

Drawdowns

LJUL vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LJUL drawdown since its inception was -3.21%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LJUL and FFTY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LJULFFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-59.46%

+56.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.08%

-23.29%

+22.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-30.57%

+30.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.13%

-22.39%

+22.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

8.12%

-7.77%

Volatility

LJUL vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL) is 0.76%, while Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a volatility of 13.07%. This indicates that LJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LJULFFTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

13.07%

-12.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.30%

28.79%

-27.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.96%

34.51%

-30.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.39%

28.99%

-25.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.39%

27.17%

-23.78%