LITP vs. XLEI
LITP (Sprott Lithium Miners ETF) and XLEI (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - LITP tracks the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross while XLEI tracks the S&P Energy Select Sector. Both are passively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LITP charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLEI.
Performance
LITP vs. XLEI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LITP achieves a 28.96% return, which is significantly higher than XLEI's 20.42% return.
LITP
- 1D
- -4.66%
- 1M
- -7.17%
- YTD
- 28.96%
- 6M
- 41.58%
- 1Y
- 218.79%
- 3Y*
- -0.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLEI
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 20.42%
- 6M
- 20.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LITP vs. XLEI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | 28.96% | 94.06% |
XLEI State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 20.42% | 6.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between LITP and XLEI is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.04 |
LITP vs. XLEI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LITP
XLEI
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
LITP
XLEI
-
Communication Services
LITP
-
XLEI
-
Consumer Cyclical
LITP
-
XLEI
-
Consumer Defensive
LITP
-
XLEI
-
Energy
LITP
-
XLEI
-
Financial Services
LITP
-
XLEI
Healthcare
LITP
-
XLEI
-
Industrials
LITP
-
XLEI
-
Real Estate
LITP
-
XLEI
-
Technology
LITP
-
XLEI
-
Utilities
LITP
-
XLEI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LITP vs. XLEI — Risk / Return Rank
LITP
XLEI
LITP vs. XLEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LITP | XLEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.78 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.67 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.08 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LITP | XLEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 2.65 | -2.72 |
Drawdowns
LITP vs. XLEI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LITP drawdown since its inception was -74.72%, which is greater than XLEI's maximum drawdown of -7.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITP and XLEI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LITP | XLEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.72% | -7.98% | -66.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.47% | -0.97% | -13.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.29% | -1.52% | -40.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.23% | — | — |
Volatility
LITP vs. XLEI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LITP | XLEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.34% | 13.16% | +45.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.34% | 13.16% | +34.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.34% | 13.16% | +34.18% |
LITP vs. XLEI - Expense Ratio Comparison
LITP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XLEI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
LITP vs. XLEI - Dividend Comparison
LITP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, less than XLEI's 16.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | 5.74% | 7.41% | 6.55% | 2.80% |
XLEI State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 16.59% | 10.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LITP and XLEI have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLEI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLEI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LITP.
XLEI has the higher dividend yield at 16.59%, compared with 5.74% for LITP.
LITP tracks Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while XLEI tracks S&P Energy Select Sector. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LITP and 0.35% for XLEI.
Find the right allocation for LITP and XLEI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer