LITP vs. GEL
LITP (Sprott Lithium Miners ETF) is Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GEL (Genesis Energy, L.P.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, LITP returned -13.11%/yr vs 22.09%/yr for GEL. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LITP vs. GEL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LITP achieves a -17.54% return, which is significantly lower than GEL's 1.55% return.
LITP
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -19.49%
- 6M
- -23.27%
- YTD
- -17.54%
- 1Y
- 63.07%
- 3Y*
- -13.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -14.86%
GEL
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 9.25%
- 6M
- -5.61%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- -5.95%
- 3Y*
- 22.09%
- 5Y*
- 14.59%
- 10Y*
- -1.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.74M | $2.69M | $4.59M | |
| $235.50K | $292.96K | $956.89K |
LITP vs. GEL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | -17.54% | 94.65% | -43.85% | -36.71% |
GEL Genesis Energy, L.P. | 1.55% | 61.77% | -8.37% | 6.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between LITP and GEL is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023 | 0.11 |
The correlation between LITP and GEL shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LITP vs. GEL — Risk / Return Rank
LITP
GEL
LITP vs. GEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LITP | GEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 0.97 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | -0.32 | +1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.81 | -0.75 | +4.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LITP vs. GEL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LITP drawdown since its inception was -74.94%, smaller than the maximum GEL drawdown of -91.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITP and GEL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LITP | GEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.94% | -91.63% | +16.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.50% | -24.19% | -21.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.76% | -31.46% | -39.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.32% | -36.63% | -8.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.29% | -34.17% | -8.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.84% | 10.41% | +6.43% |
Volatility
LITP vs. GEL - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) has a higher volatility of 10.66% compared to Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL) at 8.09%. This indicates that LITP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GEL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LITP | GEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.66% | 8.09% | +2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.49% | 18.66% | +21.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.82% | 27.90% | +30.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.58% | 40.77% | +6.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.58% | 51.17% | -3.59% |
Dividends
LITP vs. GEL - Dividend Comparison
LITP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.98%, more than GEL's 4.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEL Genesis Energy, L.P. | 4.74% | 4.23% | 6.08% | 5.18% | 5.88% | 5.60% | 16.10% | 10.74% | 11.37% | 11.87% | 7.54% | 6.72% |
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | 8.98% | 7.41% | 6.55% | 2.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LITP and GEL have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LITP has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to GEL (8.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LITP dropped -74.94% vs GEL's -91.63%.
LITP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LITP and GEL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer