PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LITP vs. DVXE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LITP vs. DVXE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and WEBs Energy XLE Defined Volatility ETF (DVXE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LITP achieves a -17.54% return, which is significantly lower than DVXE's 50.61% return.


LITP

1D
-1.30%
1M
-19.49%
6M
-23.27%
YTD
-17.54%
1Y
63.07%
3Y*
-13.11%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-14.86%

DVXE

1D
1.38%
1M
15.67%
6M
26.93%
YTD
50.61%
1Y
61.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
55.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$14.59K$12.40K$16.43K
$235.50K$292.96K$956.89K

LITP vs. DVXE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
-17.54%67.56%
DVXE
WEBs Energy XLE Defined Volatility ETF
50.61%4.49%

Correlation

The correlation between LITP and DVXE is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LITP vs. DVXE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LITP
LITP Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LITP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LITP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
LITP Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
LITP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
LITP Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

DVXE
DVXE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DVXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVXE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
DVXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVXE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LITP vs. DVXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and WEBs Energy XLE Defined Volatility ETF (DVXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LITPDVXEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.29

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

2.59

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.81

6.05

-2.25

LITP vs. DVXE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LITP Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the DVXE Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LITP and DVXE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LITP vs. DVXE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LITP drawdown since its inception was -74.94%, which is greater than DVXE's maximum drawdown of -21.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITP and DVXE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LITPDVXEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.94%

-21.83%

-53.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.50%

-21.83%

-23.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.32%

-8.57%

-36.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.29%

-7.25%

-35.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.84%

9.37%

+7.47%

Volatility

LITP vs. DVXE - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) has a higher volatility of 10.66% compared to WEBs Energy XLE Defined Volatility ETF (DVXE) at 8.29%. This indicates that LITP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVXE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LITPDVXEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.66%

8.29%

+2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.49%

22.36%

+18.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.82%

30.92%

+27.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.58%

30.78%

+16.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.58%

30.78%

+16.80%

LITP vs. DVXE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LITP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DVXE's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

LITP vs. DVXE - Dividend Comparison

LITP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.98%, while DVXE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
DVXE
WEBs Energy XLE Defined Volatility ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
8.98%7.41%6.55%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


LITP and DVXE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LITP has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to DVXE (8.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LITP dropped -74.94% vs DVXE's -21.83%.

On 1-year performance, LITP leads with 63.07% vs 61.29% for DVXE. On fees, LITP is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, DVXE has been the lower-risk option at 8.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LITP has performed better with a 63.07% return vs 61.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LITP is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXE.

LITP has the higher dividend yield at 8.98%, compared with 0.00% for DVXE.

LITP is categorized as Lithium & Battery Metals, while DVXE is Energy Equities. LITP tracks Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DVXE tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLE Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and WEBs. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LITP and 0.89% for DVXE.

DVXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LITP and DVXE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer