LIT vs. MLPB
LIT (Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF) and MLPB (ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B) are both exchange-traded funds - LIT is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the Solactive Global Lithium Index, while MLPB is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LIT returned 12.82%/yr vs 8.72%/yr for MLPB. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LIT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for MLPB.
Performance
LIT vs. MLPB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIT achieves a 12.49% return, which is significantly lower than MLPB's 24.64% return. Over the past 10 years, LIT has outperformed MLPB with an annualized return of 12.82%, while MLPB has yielded a comparatively lower 8.72% annualized return.
LIT
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- -4.62%
- 6M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 12.49%
- 1Y
- 73.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.48%
- 5Y*
- -2.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.67%
MLPB
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 5.83%
- 6M
- 13.93%
- YTD
- 24.64%
- 1Y
- 23.96%
- 3Y*
- 21.68%
- 5Y*
- 22.90%
- 10Y*
- 8.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $15.84M | $16.64M | $32.68M | |
| $110.82K | $110.30K | $134.97K |
LIT vs. MLPB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 12.49% | 60.05% | -19.19% | -12.18% | -29.91% | 36.74% | 127.88% | 3.27% | -28.63% | 64.19% |
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 24.64% | 7.40% | 25.53% | 22.01% | 30.22% | 39.42% | -30.80% | 5.69% | -8.79% | -9.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIT and MLPB is -0.16, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2015 | 0.26 |
The correlation between LIT and MLPB shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.27 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIT vs. MLPB — Risk / Return Rank
LIT
MLPB
LIT vs. MLPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIT | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.29 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 2.59 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.43 | 7.17 | +1.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIT vs. MLPB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIT drawdown since its inception was -65.91%, smaller than the maximum MLPB drawdown of -71.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIT and MLPB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIT | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.91% | -71.93% | +6.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.84% | -9.28% | -17.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.65% | -16.49% | -32.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.91% | -20.41% | -45.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.91% | -71.93% | +6.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.35% | -1.63% | -19.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.47% | -14.65% | -18.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.74% | 3.35% | +5.39% |
Volatility
LIT vs. MLPB - Volatility Comparison
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) has a higher volatility of 9.63% compared to ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) at 4.40%. This indicates that LIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIT | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.63% | 4.40% | +5.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.74% | 11.01% | +13.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.49% | 14.10% | +20.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.91% | 19.58% | +12.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.82% | 27.20% | +3.62% |
LIT vs. MLPB - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPB's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
LIT vs. MLPB - Dividend Comparison
LIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than MLPB's 5.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 0.69% | 0.49% | 0.93% | 1.11% | 0.99% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 1.85% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.15% | 0.24% |
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 5.79% | 6.51% | 5.95% | 6.37% | 6.00% | 6.98% | 11.93% | 7.98% | 8.11% | 7.23% | 6.85% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIT and MLPB have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIT has higher volatility (9.63%) compared to MLPB (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIT dropped -65.91% vs MLPB's -71.93%.
On 10-year performance, LIT leads with 12.82% vs 8.72% for MLPB. On fees, LIT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, MLPB has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, LIT has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 8.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LIT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MLPB.
MLPB has the higher dividend yield at 5.79%, compared with 0.69% for LIT.
LIT is categorized as Lithium & Battery Metals, while MLPB is Infrastructure Equities. LIT tracks Solactive Global Lithium Index, while MLPB tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for LIT and 0.85% for MLPB.
LIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIT and MLPB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer