PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIT vs. DRIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LIT vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LIT vs. DRIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
14.63%60.05%-19.19%-12.18%-29.91%36.74%127.88%3.27%-17.22%
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
3.17%30.42%-5.04%26.14%-34.13%27.80%62.76%28.54%-21.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIT achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly higher than DRIV's 3.17% return.


LIT

1D
2.54%
1M
-1.39%
YTD
14.63%
6M
31.14%
1Y
92.83%
3Y*
6.29%
5Y*
5.25%
10Y*
14.87%

DRIV

1D
4.83%
1M
-6.54%
YTD
3.17%
6M
8.45%
1Y
46.14%
3Y*
10.34%
5Y*
3.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LIT vs. DRIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIV's 0.68% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LIT vs. DRIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIT
LIT Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
LIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
LIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIT Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIV
DRIV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DRIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIT vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LITDRIVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.70

1.64

+1.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.28

2.29

+0.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.30

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.00

2.70

+2.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.45

10.20

+9.24

LIT vs. DRIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIT Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the DRIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIT and DRIV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LITDRIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

1.64

+1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.14

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.39

-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between LIT and DRIV is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

LIT vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison

LIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than DRIV's 1.04% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
0.42%0.49%0.93%1.11%0.99%0.22%0.40%1.85%2.52%3.26%2.15%0.24%
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
1.04%1.07%2.07%1.62%1.24%0.32%0.29%1.23%2.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LIT vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIT drawdown since its inception was -65.91%, which is greater than DRIV's maximum drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIT and DRIV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LITDRIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.91%

-41.93%

-23.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.61%

-16.43%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.91%

-41.93%

-23.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.86%

-9.25%

-10.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.90%

-15.43%

-18.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.63%

4.34%

+0.29%

Volatility

LIT vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) has a higher volatility of 11.99% compared to Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) at 10.61%. This indicates that LIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LITDRIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.99%

10.61%

+1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.73%

19.22%

+5.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.57%

28.35%

+6.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.68%

26.73%

+4.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.50%

27.35%

+3.15%